{"id":258307,"date":"2024-02-21T22:57:07","date_gmt":"2024-02-21T19:27:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/uncategorized\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/"},"modified":"2024-02-21T22:57:07","modified_gmt":"2024-02-21T19:27:07","slug":"implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/politics\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/","title":{"rendered":"Implicit Decree \u201cPreventing Attack on Rafah\u201d – ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit"},"content":{"rendered":"

Reza Nasri \u2013 International Jurist<\/p>\n

In response to South Africa\u2019s request, the ICJ issued a statement containing its \u201cdecision\u201d in which \u2013 citing comments by the UN secretary-general calling the humanitarian situation in Gaza \u201ca nightmare\u201d \u2013 reaffirmed the need for Israel to comply with the binding provisional order issued on January 26. In this regard, the Court\u2019s response to South Africa\u2019s request sparked various interpretations and critical reactions that for most part questionable. In this context, it is important to mention a few points on the matter:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. In its recent appeal, South Africa had not requested \u201cspecific\u201d safeguard measures from the Court. Some reactions are based on the faulty assumption that South Africa \u2013 in order to prevent the Israeli regime\u2019s military from entering Rafah \u2013 had asked the Court to issue a \u201cceasefire order\u201d. The truth is that South Africa had based its request under Article 75(1) of the \u201cRules of Court\u201d, which grants the ICJ the authority to examine proprio motu<\/em> \u00a0the circumstances of the case and decide by itself \u00a0– rather than at the request of one party – whether it requires the indication of provisional measures.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

     <\/p>\n

      \n
    1. The reason South Africa referred to Article 75(1) as opposed to Article 76(1) \u2013 which would have required the Court to schedule oral hearings – seems to stem from the necessity to obtain an order in the most expedited manner, which is understandable given the imminence of an Israeli military incursion into Rafah. Of course, had South Africa made its request under Article 76(1), it could have further elaborated its arguments before the judges and asked for the indication of specific measures. However, it appears that for South African lawyers \u201ctime\u201d was a more pertinent and pressing factor, considering unfolding conditions on the ground.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

       <\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

      3- Since Article 75(1) of the Rules of Court gives the ICJ the authority to decide \u00a0\u2013 at its own discretion \u2013 whether the case requires the indication of provisional measures in the course of the proceedings, the submission of a \u201crequest\u201d by one of the litigants is irrelevant under this provision. In fact, in its \u201cobservations\u201d submitted to the Court, the Israeli regime raised this argument claiming that South Africa\u2019s making of a \u201crequest\u201d under Article 75(1) is a \u201ccontradiction in terms\u201d given that Article 75(1) \u201cconcerns the indication of provisional measures by the Court proprio motu<\/em>, rather that at the request of a party\u201d. However, despite Israel\u2019s objection, and instead of outright rejecting South Africa\u2019s request, the Court deemed necessary to reiterate the need for Israel to comply with the binding provisional order issued on January 26, while emphasizing on the \u201chumanitarian nightmare\u201d that has exponentially increased due to recent developments (namely the unfolding situation in Rafah).<\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

      4 \u2013 The Court\u2019s decision not to indicate new measures, coupled with the Court\u2019s decision to \u201cformally\u201d reiterate Israel\u2019s obligation to comply with the current interim order despite South Africa\u2019s reliance on Article 75(1), indicates that the ICJ considers the existing provisional measures as legally \u201csufficient\u201d to bar an Israeli incursion into Rafah, which would undoubtedly exasperate the humanitarian crisis.<\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

      In other words, considering the fact that the Court could have ignored a rather unusual request made under Article 75(1) by one of the parties, it is fair to say that – by recalling the binding nature of the existing provisional measures and by stressing the urgency for Israel to comply with them – the Court effectively took position in favour of South Africa\u2019s demand in view of the exceptionally catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza.<\/p>\n

      Aside from the fact that South Africa\u2019s request \u2014 along with the Court\u2019s subsequent response \u2014 will eventually prove to be detrimental to the Israeli regime\u2019s stance in the merit phase of the proceedings, it is necessary \u2013 in view of the Court\u2019s remarkable approach\u2013 to support the position that the current [January 26] provisional order is amply sufficient to legally prohibit Israel from deteriorating the humanitarian crisis by entering Rafah.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      Strategic Council Online- Opinion: On February 12, the South African government once again appealed to The International Court of Justice (ICJ) to demand the indication of new measures in light of statements made by the Israeli prime minister\u2019s office on the necessity of a military incursion into the Rafah region in the Gaza Strip and in light of subsequent operations conducted thereafter.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":256600,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[13268,17,12726],"tags":[24221,23355,41267,41266,5759,21663,13078],"class_list":["post-258307","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-note","category-politics","category-10-en-2","tag-gaza-en-2","tag-international-court-of-justice","tag-military-operations-of-the-israeli-regime-in-rafah","tag-rafah-en","tag-5759","tag-south-africa","tag---en"],"yoast_head":"\nImplicit Decree \u201cPreventing Attack on Rafah\u201d - ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit - Strategic Council on Foreign Relations<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/politics\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/en\\\/politics\\\/258307\\\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/en\\\/politics\\\/258307\\\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\u062c\u0648\u0627\u062f \u0645\u062f\u062f\u06cc\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/fa\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/35df72a1a82f18cf1cb487d0c5afdb26\"},\"headline\":\"Implicit Decree \u201cPreventing Attack on Rafah\u201d – ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-21T19:27:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/en\\\/politics\\\/258307\\\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":671,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/fa\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/en\\\/politics\\\/258307\\\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/\u0644\u0627\u0647\u0647.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Gaza\",\"International Court of Justice\",\"Military operations of the Israeli regime in Rafah\",\"Rafah\",\"Reza Nasri\",\"South Africa\",\"Zionist regime\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Note\",\"Politics\",\"Top News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/en\\\/politics\\\/258307\\\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/en\\\/politics\\\/258307\\\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\\\/\",\"name\":\"Implicit Decree \u201cPreventing Attack on Rafah\u201d - ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit - Strategic Council on Foreign Relations\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/fa\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/en\\\/politics\\\/258307\\\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/en\\\/politics\\\/258307\\\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/\u0644\u0627\u0647\u0647.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-21T19:27:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/en\\\/politics\\\/258307\\\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/en\\\/politics\\\/258307\\\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/en\\\/politics\\\/258307\\\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/\u0644\u0627\u0647\u0647.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/\u0644\u0627\u0647\u0647.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":800},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/en\\\/politics\\\/258307\\\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u0646\u0645\u0627\u06cc \u0631\u0627\u0647\u0628\u0631\u062f\u06cc\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/fa\\\/category\\\/300\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"\u06cc\u0627\u062f\u062f\u0627\u0634\u062a\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/fa\\\/category\\\/300\\\/30101\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"Implicit Decree \u201cPreventing Attack on Rafah\u201d – ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/fa\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/fa\\\/\",\"name\":\"\u0634\u0648\u0631\u0627\u06cc \u0631\u0627\u0647\u0628\u0631\u062f\u06cc \u0631\u0648\u0627\u0628\u0637 \u062e\u0627\u0631\u062c\u06cc\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/fa\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/fa\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/fa\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"\u0634\u0648\u0631\u0627\u06cc \u0631\u0627\u0647\u0628\u0631\u062f\u06cc \u0631\u0648\u0627\u0628\u0637 \u062e\u0627\u0631\u062c\u06cc\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/fa\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/fa\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/03\\\/Logo-Blue2.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/03\\\/Logo-Blue2.svg\",\"width\":1,\"height\":1,\"caption\":\"\u0634\u0648\u0631\u0627\u06cc \u0631\u0627\u0647\u0628\u0631\u062f\u06cc \u0631\u0648\u0627\u0628\u0637 \u062e\u0627\u0631\u062c\u06cc\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/fa\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scfr.ir\\\/fa\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/35df72a1a82f18cf1cb487d0c5afdb26\",\"name\":\"\u062c\u0648\u0627\u062f \u0645\u062f\u062f\u06cc\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scfr.ir\\\/en\\\/author\\\/madadi\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Implicit Decree \u201cPreventing Attack on Rafah\u201d - ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit - Strategic Council on Foreign Relations","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/politics\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/politics\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/politics\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/"},"author":{"name":"\u062c\u0648\u0627\u062f \u0645\u062f\u062f\u06cc","@id":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/fa\/#\/schema\/person\/35df72a1a82f18cf1cb487d0c5afdb26"},"headline":"Implicit Decree \u201cPreventing Attack on Rafah\u201d – ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit","datePublished":"2024-02-21T19:27:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/politics\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/"},"wordCount":671,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/fa\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/politics\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/\u0644\u0627\u0647\u0647.jpg","keywords":["Gaza","International Court of Justice","Military operations of the Israeli regime in Rafah","Rafah","Reza Nasri","South Africa","Zionist regime"],"articleSection":["Note","Politics","Top News"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/politics\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/","url":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/politics\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/","name":"Implicit Decree \u201cPreventing Attack on Rafah\u201d - ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit - Strategic Council on Foreign Relations","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/fa\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/politics\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/politics\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/\u0644\u0627\u0647\u0647.jpg","datePublished":"2024-02-21T19:27:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/politics\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/politics\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/politics\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/\u0644\u0627\u0647\u0647.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/\u0644\u0627\u0647\u0647.jpg","width":1200,"height":800},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/politics\/258307\/implicit-decree-preventing-attack-on-rafah-icj-decision-in-south-africa-vs-israel-lawsuit\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"","item":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u0646\u0645\u0627\u06cc \u0631\u0627\u0647\u0628\u0631\u062f\u06cc","item":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/fa\/category\/300\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"\u06cc\u0627\u062f\u062f\u0627\u0634\u062a","item":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/fa\/category\/300\/30101\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Implicit Decree \u201cPreventing Attack on Rafah\u201d – ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/fa\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/fa\/","name":"\u0634\u0648\u0631\u0627\u06cc \u0631\u0627\u0647\u0628\u0631\u062f\u06cc \u0631\u0648\u0627\u0628\u0637 \u062e\u0627\u0631\u062c\u06cc","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/fa\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/fa\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/fa\/#organization","name":"\u0634\u0648\u0631\u0627\u06cc \u0631\u0627\u0647\u0628\u0631\u062f\u06cc \u0631\u0648\u0627\u0628\u0637 \u062e\u0627\u0631\u062c\u06cc","url":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/fa\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/fa\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Logo-Blue2.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Logo-Blue2.svg","width":1,"height":1,"caption":"\u0634\u0648\u0631\u0627\u06cc \u0631\u0627\u0647\u0628\u0631\u062f\u06cc \u0631\u0648\u0627\u0628\u0637 \u062e\u0627\u0631\u062c\u06cc"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/fa\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scfr.ir\/fa\/#\/schema\/person\/35df72a1a82f18cf1cb487d0c5afdb26","name":"\u062c\u0648\u0627\u062f \u0645\u062f\u062f\u06cc","url":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/author\/madadi\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258307","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=258307"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258307\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/256600"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=258307"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=258307"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scfr.ir\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=258307"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}