SCFR Online – Opinion: Competition among great powers is no longer solely about oil; rather, control over rare minerals has now become the most important geopolitical arena for the global economy and technology.
SCFR Online – Opinion: The confrontation between Iran and the West has moved beyond traditional military arenas and now continues in the realm of perception, data, and artificial intelligence.
SCFR Online – Opinion: Iran’s display of power in the recent imposed war and Washington’s turning away from its traditional allies have pushed Persian Gulf countries toward new partners in the East.
SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.
SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.
SCFR Online – Note: Articles from Western think tanks confirm that, contrary to Western assumptions, the war has failed to cause Iran’s economy to collapse, and this situation has led Washington to seek a pathway for exiting the quagmire.
SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.
SCFR Online – Opinion: The recent mobilization by certain members of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council toward more active participation in NATO security arrangements should not be interpreted as a sudden shift or fundamental transformation in these countries’ foreign policies.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on West Asian affairs stated: The 12-day war of the Israeli regime against Iran, despite its aggressive and destructive nature, can turn into a strategic opportunity for our country; a chance to legitimize defense policies and strengthen the Resistance Discourse in the international system. In a world where public opinion plays an increasing role in shaping policies, effective narrative-building about this war is the key to turning threat into opportunity. Iran, relying on public diplomacy and transnational media, can present the Israeli regime’s attacks as a blatant violation of international law and emphasize its legitimate right to defense and deterrence. Furthermore, by portraying itself as logical, resistant, and oppressed, it can pave the way for increased regional and global empathy. Ultimately, this war can provide a platform for domestic consensus, cohesion of the Resistance Axis, and redefining Iran’s position as a responsible actor in regional security equations.
Strategic Council Online Opinion: The 12-day imposed war, which began on June 12 of this year with the Zionist regime’s invasion of Iranian soil, marked one of the darkest chapters in Iran’s contemporary history. This conflict started with Israel’s surprise attacks on Iran’s military and nuclear facilities, as well as civilian targets, including several hospitals. It was accompanied by the targeted assassinations of military commanders and prominent nuclear scientists, the destruction of Evin Prison (resulting in 71 deaths), and the bombing of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB. The direct involvement of the U.S., through the bombing of Iran’s peaceful nuclear facilities in Fordow and Isfahan, completed this tragedy. These actions not only constituted a blatant violation of international obligations, including the UN Charter, the Geneva Conventions, and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), but also imposed heavy legal and criminal responsibility on the U.S. and the Israeli regime.
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Military attack on the civilian nuclear facilities of any country that is a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) constitutes a clear violation of the United Nations Charter, international humanitarian law, and specifically the NPT.
Strategic Council Online– Opinion: International law, as a set of rules and principles governing relations between states, always emphasizes the preservation of peace, security, and sovereignty of states. One of the fundamental principles of this legal system is respect for the territorial sovereignty of states and the prohibition of violating their territorial integrity without legal authorization.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international law said: If two-thirds of the 124 member states of the International Criminal Court support the Court’s verdict to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant, it would be sufficient politically and legally. This verdict is intended to exert political and international pressure on the officials of the Zionist regime, especially Benjamin Netanyahu, so that, while condemning the actions and behavior that have been taken against the people of Gaza to date, this behavior and support for them will change in the future.
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime alone lacks the necessary and sufficient capacities to carry out belligerent policies, terror, genocide, and violence in the “long term.” What has kept this regime afloat for more than 75 years and has caused its bellicosity to continue is mainly due to two fundamental factors: First, the support of Western countries, especially the United States, for the Zionist regime, and second, the complete passivity and self-defeat of some Arab governments in the face of crimes of the Zionists.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer said legal capacities cannot be exploited without political and diplomatic resolve and action; therefore, regional and international cooperation “around the axis of the recent advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict should be placed on the agenda of the diplomatic apparatus of the new government.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the Security Council, General Assembly Human Rights Council, and other UN bodies from now on, even if they don’t want to, will have to include the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in their future statements and resolutions. Calling the Israeli regime “occupier” and referring to its illegal actions in the Occupied Territories against the Palestinians is a political and legal failure for this regime and its supporters.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: One of the strategic and long-term dimensions of Iran’s tough missile-drone response to the Occupied Territories will be the further withdrawal of the Zionist regime from its positions in the Gaza war.
SCFR Online – Opinion: Competition among great powers is no longer solely about oil; rather, control over rare minerals has now become the most important geopolitical arena for the global economy and technology.
SCFR Online – Opinion: The confrontation between Iran and the West has moved beyond traditional military arenas and now continues in the realm of perception, data, and artificial intelligence.
SCFR Online – Opinion: Iran’s display of power in the recent imposed war and Washington’s turning away from its traditional allies have pushed Persian Gulf countries toward new partners in the East.
SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.
SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.
SCFR Online – Note: Articles from Western think tanks confirm that, contrary to Western assumptions, the war has failed to cause Iran’s economy to collapse, and this situation has led Washington to seek a pathway for exiting the quagmire.
SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.
SCFR Online – Opinion: The recent mobilization by certain members of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council toward more active participation in NATO security arrangements should not be interpreted as a sudden shift or fundamental transformation in these countries’ foreign policies.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on West Asian affairs stated: The 12-day war of the Israeli regime against Iran, despite its aggressive and destructive nature, can turn into a strategic opportunity for our country; a chance to legitimize defense policies and strengthen the Resistance Discourse in the international system. In a world where public opinion plays an increasing role in shaping policies, effective narrative-building about this war is the key to turning threat into opportunity. Iran, relying on public diplomacy and transnational media, can present the Israeli regime’s attacks as a blatant violation of international law and emphasize its legitimate right to defense and deterrence. Furthermore, by portraying itself as logical, resistant, and oppressed, it can pave the way for increased regional and global empathy. Ultimately, this war can provide a platform for domestic consensus, cohesion of the Resistance Axis, and redefining Iran’s position as a responsible actor in regional security equations.
Strategic Council Online Opinion: The 12-day imposed war, which began on June 12 of this year with the Zionist regime’s invasion of Iranian soil, marked one of the darkest chapters in Iran’s contemporary history. This conflict started with Israel’s surprise attacks on Iran’s military and nuclear facilities, as well as civilian targets, including several hospitals. It was accompanied by the targeted assassinations of military commanders and prominent nuclear scientists, the destruction of Evin Prison (resulting in 71 deaths), and the bombing of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB. The direct involvement of the U.S., through the bombing of Iran’s peaceful nuclear facilities in Fordow and Isfahan, completed this tragedy. These actions not only constituted a blatant violation of international obligations, including the UN Charter, the Geneva Conventions, and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), but also imposed heavy legal and criminal responsibility on the U.S. and the Israeli regime.
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Military attack on the civilian nuclear facilities of any country that is a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) constitutes a clear violation of the United Nations Charter, international humanitarian law, and specifically the NPT.
Strategic Council Online– Opinion: International law, as a set of rules and principles governing relations between states, always emphasizes the preservation of peace, security, and sovereignty of states. One of the fundamental principles of this legal system is respect for the territorial sovereignty of states and the prohibition of violating their territorial integrity without legal authorization.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international law said: If two-thirds of the 124 member states of the International Criminal Court support the Court’s verdict to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant, it would be sufficient politically and legally. This verdict is intended to exert political and international pressure on the officials of the Zionist regime, especially Benjamin Netanyahu, so that, while condemning the actions and behavior that have been taken against the people of Gaza to date, this behavior and support for them will change in the future.
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime alone lacks the necessary and sufficient capacities to carry out belligerent policies, terror, genocide, and violence in the “long term.” What has kept this regime afloat for more than 75 years and has caused its bellicosity to continue is mainly due to two fundamental factors: First, the support of Western countries, especially the United States, for the Zionist regime, and second, the complete passivity and self-defeat of some Arab governments in the face of crimes of the Zionists.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer said legal capacities cannot be exploited without political and diplomatic resolve and action; therefore, regional and international cooperation “around the axis of the recent advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict should be placed on the agenda of the diplomatic apparatus of the new government.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the Security Council, General Assembly Human Rights Council, and other UN bodies from now on, even if they don’t want to, will have to include the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in their future statements and resolutions. Calling the Israeli regime “occupier” and referring to its illegal actions in the Occupied Territories against the Palestinians is a political and legal failure for this regime and its supporters.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: One of the strategic and long-term dimensions of Iran’s tough missile-drone response to the Occupied Territories will be the further withdrawal of the Zionist regime from its positions in the Gaza war.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on West Asian affairs stated: The 12-day war of the Israeli regime against Iran, despite its aggressive and destructive nature, can turn into a strategic opportunity for our country; a chance to legitimize defense policies and strengthen the Resistance Discourse in the international system. In a world where public opinion plays an increasing role in shaping policies, effective narrative-building about this war is the key to turning threat into opportunity. Iran, relying on public diplomacy and transnational media, can present the Israeli regime’s attacks as a blatant violation of international law and emphasize its legitimate right to defense and deterrence. Furthermore, by portraying itself as logical, resistant, and oppressed, it can pave the way for increased regional and global empathy. Ultimately, this war can provide a platform for domestic consensus, cohesion of the Resistance Axis, and redefining Iran’s position as a responsible actor in regional security equations.
Strategic Council Online Opinion: The 12-day imposed war, which began on June 12 of this year with the Zionist regime’s invasion of Iranian soil, marked one of the darkest chapters in Iran’s contemporary history. This conflict started with Israel’s surprise attacks on Iran’s military and nuclear facilities, as well as civilian targets, including several hospitals. It was accompanied by the targeted assassinations of military commanders and prominent nuclear scientists, the destruction of Evin Prison (resulting in 71 deaths), and the bombing of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB. The direct involvement of the U.S., through the bombing of Iran’s peaceful nuclear facilities in Fordow and Isfahan, completed this tragedy. These actions not only constituted a blatant violation of international obligations, including the UN Charter, the Geneva Conventions, and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), but also imposed heavy legal and criminal responsibility on the U.S. and the Israeli regime.
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Military attack on the civilian nuclear facilities of any country that is a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) constitutes a clear violation of the United Nations Charter, international humanitarian law, and specifically the NPT.
Strategic Council Online– Opinion: International law, as a set of rules and principles governing relations between states, always emphasizes the preservation of peace, security, and sovereignty of states. One of the fundamental principles of this legal system is respect for the territorial sovereignty of states and the prohibition of violating their territorial integrity without legal authorization.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international law said: If two-thirds of the 124 member states of the International Criminal Court support the Court’s verdict to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant, it would be sufficient politically and legally. This verdict is intended to exert political and international pressure on the officials of the Zionist regime, especially Benjamin Netanyahu, so that, while condemning the actions and behavior that have been taken against the people of Gaza to date, this behavior and support for them will change in the future.
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime alone lacks the necessary and sufficient capacities to carry out belligerent policies, terror, genocide, and violence in the “long term.” What has kept this regime afloat for more than 75 years and has caused its bellicosity to continue is mainly due to two fundamental factors: First, the support of Western countries, especially the United States, for the Zionist regime, and second, the complete passivity and self-defeat of some Arab governments in the face of crimes of the Zionists.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer said legal capacities cannot be exploited without political and diplomatic resolve and action; therefore, regional and international cooperation “around the axis of the recent advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict should be placed on the agenda of the diplomatic apparatus of the new government.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the Security Council, General Assembly Human Rights Council, and other UN bodies from now on, even if they don’t want to, will have to include the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in their future statements and resolutions. Calling the Israeli regime “occupier” and referring to its illegal actions in the Occupied Territories against the Palestinians is a political and legal failure for this regime and its supporters.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: One of the strategic and long-term dimensions of Iran’s tough missile-drone response to the Occupied Territories will be the further withdrawal of the Zionist regime from its positions in the Gaza war.
SCFR Online – Opinion: Competition among great powers is no longer solely about oil; rather, control over rare minerals has now become the most important geopolitical arena for the global economy and technology.
SCFR Online – Opinion: The confrontation between Iran and the West has moved beyond traditional military arenas and now continues in the realm of perception, data, and artificial intelligence.
SCFR Online – Opinion: Iran’s display of power in the recent imposed war and Washington’s turning away from its traditional allies have pushed Persian Gulf countries toward new partners in the East.
SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.
SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.
SCFR Online – Note: Articles from Western think tanks confirm that, contrary to Western assumptions, the war has failed to cause Iran’s economy to collapse, and this situation has led Washington to seek a pathway for exiting the quagmire.
SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.
SCFR Online – Opinion: The recent mobilization by certain members of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council toward more active participation in NATO security arrangements should not be interpreted as a sudden shift or fundamental transformation in these countries’ foreign policies.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on West Asian affairs stated: The 12-day war of the Israeli regime against Iran, despite its aggressive and destructive nature, can turn into a strategic opportunity for our country; a chance to legitimize defense policies and strengthen the Resistance Discourse in the international system. In a world where public opinion plays an increasing role in shaping policies, effective narrative-building about this war is the key to turning threat into opportunity. Iran, relying on public diplomacy and transnational media, can present the Israeli regime’s attacks as a blatant violation of international law and emphasize its legitimate right to defense and deterrence. Furthermore, by portraying itself as logical, resistant, and oppressed, it can pave the way for increased regional and global empathy. Ultimately, this war can provide a platform for domestic consensus, cohesion of the Resistance Axis, and redefining Iran’s position as a responsible actor in regional security equations.
Strategic Council Online Opinion: The 12-day imposed war, which began on June 12 of this year with the Zionist regime’s invasion of Iranian soil, marked one of the darkest chapters in Iran’s contemporary history. This conflict started with Israel’s surprise attacks on Iran’s military and nuclear facilities, as well as civilian targets, including several hospitals. It was accompanied by the targeted assassinations of military commanders and prominent nuclear scientists, the destruction of Evin Prison (resulting in 71 deaths), and the bombing of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB. The direct involvement of the U.S., through the bombing of Iran’s peaceful nuclear facilities in Fordow and Isfahan, completed this tragedy. These actions not only constituted a blatant violation of international obligations, including the UN Charter, the Geneva Conventions, and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), but also imposed heavy legal and criminal responsibility on the U.S. and the Israeli regime.
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Military attack on the civilian nuclear facilities of any country that is a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) constitutes a clear violation of the United Nations Charter, international humanitarian law, and specifically the NPT.
Strategic Council Online– Opinion: International law, as a set of rules and principles governing relations between states, always emphasizes the preservation of peace, security, and sovereignty of states. One of the fundamental principles of this legal system is respect for the territorial sovereignty of states and the prohibition of violating their territorial integrity without legal authorization.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international law said: If two-thirds of the 124 member states of the International Criminal Court support the Court’s verdict to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant, it would be sufficient politically and legally. This verdict is intended to exert political and international pressure on the officials of the Zionist regime, especially Benjamin Netanyahu, so that, while condemning the actions and behavior that have been taken against the people of Gaza to date, this behavior and support for them will change in the future.
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime alone lacks the necessary and sufficient capacities to carry out belligerent policies, terror, genocide, and violence in the “long term.” What has kept this regime afloat for more than 75 years and has caused its bellicosity to continue is mainly due to two fundamental factors: First, the support of Western countries, especially the United States, for the Zionist regime, and second, the complete passivity and self-defeat of some Arab governments in the face of crimes of the Zionists.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer said legal capacities cannot be exploited without political and diplomatic resolve and action; therefore, regional and international cooperation “around the axis of the recent advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict should be placed on the agenda of the diplomatic apparatus of the new government.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the Security Council, General Assembly Human Rights Council, and other UN bodies from now on, even if they don’t want to, will have to include the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in their future statements and resolutions. Calling the Israeli regime “occupier” and referring to its illegal actions in the Occupied Territories against the Palestinians is a political and legal failure for this regime and its supporters.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: One of the strategic and long-term dimensions of Iran’s tough missile-drone response to the Occupied Territories will be the further withdrawal of the Zionist regime from its positions in the Gaza war.
SCFR Online – Opinion: Competition among great powers is no longer solely about oil; rather, control over rare minerals has now become the most important geopolitical arena for the global economy and technology.
SCFR Online – Opinion: The confrontation between Iran and the West has moved beyond traditional military arenas and now continues in the realm of perception, data, and artificial intelligence.
SCFR Online – Opinion: Iran’s display of power in the recent imposed war and Washington’s turning away from its traditional allies have pushed Persian Gulf countries toward new partners in the East.
SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.
SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.
SCFR Online – Note: Articles from Western think tanks confirm that, contrary to Western assumptions, the war has failed to cause Iran’s economy to collapse, and this situation has led Washington to seek a pathway for exiting the quagmire.
SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.
SCFR Online – Opinion: The recent mobilization by certain members of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council toward more active participation in NATO security arrangements should not be interpreted as a sudden shift or fundamental transformation in these countries’ foreign policies.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on West Asian affairs stated: The 12-day war of the Israeli regime against Iran, despite its aggressive and destructive nature, can turn into a strategic opportunity for our country; a chance to legitimize defense policies and strengthen the Resistance Discourse in the international system. In a world where public opinion plays an increasing role in shaping policies, effective narrative-building about this war is the key to turning threat into opportunity. Iran, relying on public diplomacy and transnational media, can present the Israeli regime’s attacks as a blatant violation of international law and emphasize its legitimate right to defense and deterrence. Furthermore, by portraying itself as logical, resistant, and oppressed, it can pave the way for increased regional and global empathy. Ultimately, this war can provide a platform for domestic consensus, cohesion of the Resistance Axis, and redefining Iran’s position as a responsible actor in regional security equations.
Strategic Council Online Opinion: The 12-day imposed war, which began on June 12 of this year with the Zionist regime’s invasion of Iranian soil, marked one of the darkest chapters in Iran’s contemporary history. This conflict started with Israel’s surprise attacks on Iran’s military and nuclear facilities, as well as civilian targets, including several hospitals. It was accompanied by the targeted assassinations of military commanders and prominent nuclear scientists, the destruction of Evin Prison (resulting in 71 deaths), and the bombing of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB. The direct involvement of the U.S., through the bombing of Iran’s peaceful nuclear facilities in Fordow and Isfahan, completed this tragedy. These actions not only constituted a blatant violation of international obligations, including the UN Charter, the Geneva Conventions, and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), but also imposed heavy legal and criminal responsibility on the U.S. and the Israeli regime.
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Military attack on the civilian nuclear facilities of any country that is a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) constitutes a clear violation of the United Nations Charter, international humanitarian law, and specifically the NPT.
Strategic Council Online– Opinion: International law, as a set of rules and principles governing relations between states, always emphasizes the preservation of peace, security, and sovereignty of states. One of the fundamental principles of this legal system is respect for the territorial sovereignty of states and the prohibition of violating their territorial integrity without legal authorization.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international law said: If two-thirds of the 124 member states of the International Criminal Court support the Court’s verdict to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant, it would be sufficient politically and legally. This verdict is intended to exert political and international pressure on the officials of the Zionist regime, especially Benjamin Netanyahu, so that, while condemning the actions and behavior that have been taken against the people of Gaza to date, this behavior and support for them will change in the future.
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime alone lacks the necessary and sufficient capacities to carry out belligerent policies, terror, genocide, and violence in the “long term.” What has kept this regime afloat for more than 75 years and has caused its bellicosity to continue is mainly due to two fundamental factors: First, the support of Western countries, especially the United States, for the Zionist regime, and second, the complete passivity and self-defeat of some Arab governments in the face of crimes of the Zionists.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer said legal capacities cannot be exploited without political and diplomatic resolve and action; therefore, regional and international cooperation “around the axis of the recent advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict should be placed on the agenda of the diplomatic apparatus of the new government.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the Security Council, General Assembly Human Rights Council, and other UN bodies from now on, even if they don’t want to, will have to include the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in their future statements and resolutions. Calling the Israeli regime “occupier” and referring to its illegal actions in the Occupied Territories against the Palestinians is a political and legal failure for this regime and its supporters.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: One of the strategic and long-term dimensions of Iran’s tough missile-drone response to the Occupied Territories will be the further withdrawal of the Zionist regime from its positions in the Gaza war.
SCFR Online – Opinion: Competition among great powers is no longer solely about oil; rather, control over rare minerals has now become the most important geopolitical arena for the global economy and technology.
SCFR Online – Opinion: The confrontation between Iran and the West has moved beyond traditional military arenas and now continues in the realm of perception, data, and artificial intelligence.
SCFR Online – Opinion: Iran’s display of power in the recent imposed war and Washington’s turning away from its traditional allies have pushed Persian Gulf countries toward new partners in the East.
SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.
SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.
SCFR Online – Note: Articles from Western think tanks confirm that, contrary to Western assumptions, the war has failed to cause Iran’s economy to collapse, and this situation has led Washington to seek a pathway for exiting the quagmire.
SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.
SCFR Online – Opinion: The recent mobilization by certain members of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council toward more active participation in NATO security arrangements should not be interpreted as a sudden shift or fundamental transformation in these countries’ foreign policies.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on West Asian affairs stated: The 12-day war of the Israeli regime against Iran, despite its aggressive and destructive nature, can turn into a strategic opportunity for our country; a chance to legitimize defense policies and strengthen the Resistance Discourse in the international system. In a world where public opinion plays an increasing role in shaping policies, effective narrative-building about this war is the key to turning threat into opportunity. Iran, relying on public diplomacy and transnational media, can present the Israeli regime’s attacks as a blatant violation of international law and emphasize its legitimate right to defense and deterrence. Furthermore, by portraying itself as logical, resistant, and oppressed, it can pave the way for increased regional and global empathy. Ultimately, this war can provide a platform for domestic consensus, cohesion of the Resistance Axis, and redefining Iran’s position as a responsible actor in regional security equations.
Strategic Council Online Opinion: The 12-day imposed war, which began on June 12 of this year with the Zionist regime’s invasion of Iranian soil, marked one of the darkest chapters in Iran’s contemporary history. This conflict started with Israel’s surprise attacks on Iran’s military and nuclear facilities, as well as civilian targets, including several hospitals. It was accompanied by the targeted assassinations of military commanders and prominent nuclear scientists, the destruction of Evin Prison (resulting in 71 deaths), and the bombing of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB. The direct involvement of the U.S., through the bombing of Iran’s peaceful nuclear facilities in Fordow and Isfahan, completed this tragedy. These actions not only constituted a blatant violation of international obligations, including the UN Charter, the Geneva Conventions, and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), but also imposed heavy legal and criminal responsibility on the U.S. and the Israeli regime.
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Military attack on the civilian nuclear facilities of any country that is a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) constitutes a clear violation of the United Nations Charter, international humanitarian law, and specifically the NPT.
Strategic Council Online– Opinion: International law, as a set of rules and principles governing relations between states, always emphasizes the preservation of peace, security, and sovereignty of states. One of the fundamental principles of this legal system is respect for the territorial sovereignty of states and the prohibition of violating their territorial integrity without legal authorization.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international law said: If two-thirds of the 124 member states of the International Criminal Court support the Court’s verdict to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant, it would be sufficient politically and legally. This verdict is intended to exert political and international pressure on the officials of the Zionist regime, especially Benjamin Netanyahu, so that, while condemning the actions and behavior that have been taken against the people of Gaza to date, this behavior and support for them will change in the future.
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime alone lacks the necessary and sufficient capacities to carry out belligerent policies, terror, genocide, and violence in the “long term.” What has kept this regime afloat for more than 75 years and has caused its bellicosity to continue is mainly due to two fundamental factors: First, the support of Western countries, especially the United States, for the Zionist regime, and second, the complete passivity and self-defeat of some Arab governments in the face of crimes of the Zionists.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer said legal capacities cannot be exploited without political and diplomatic resolve and action; therefore, regional and international cooperation “around the axis of the recent advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict should be placed on the agenda of the diplomatic apparatus of the new government.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the Security Council, General Assembly Human Rights Council, and other UN bodies from now on, even if they don’t want to, will have to include the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in their future statements and resolutions. Calling the Israeli regime “occupier” and referring to its illegal actions in the Occupied Territories against the Palestinians is a political and legal failure for this regime and its supporters.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: One of the strategic and long-term dimensions of Iran’s tough missile-drone response to the Occupied Territories will be the further withdrawal of the Zionist regime from its positions in the Gaza war.
SCFR Online – Opinion: Competition among great powers is no longer solely about oil; rather, control over rare minerals has now become the most important geopolitical arena for the global economy and technology.
SCFR Online – Opinion: The confrontation between Iran and the West has moved beyond traditional military arenas and now continues in the realm of perception, data, and artificial intelligence.
SCFR Online – Opinion: Iran’s display of power in the recent imposed war and Washington’s turning away from its traditional allies have pushed Persian Gulf countries toward new partners in the East.
SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.
SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.
SCFR Online – Note: Articles from Western think tanks confirm that, contrary to Western assumptions, the war has failed to cause Iran’s economy to collapse, and this situation has led Washington to seek a pathway for exiting the quagmire.
SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.
SCFR Online – Opinion: The recent mobilization by certain members of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council toward more active participation in NATO security arrangements should not be interpreted as a sudden shift or fundamental transformation in these countries’ foreign policies.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on West Asian affairs stated: The 12-day war of the Israeli regime against Iran, despite its aggressive and destructive nature, can turn into a strategic opportunity for our country; a chance to legitimize defense policies and strengthen the Resistance Discourse in the international system. In a world where public opinion plays an increasing role in shaping policies, effective narrative-building about this war is the key to turning threat into opportunity. Iran, relying on public diplomacy and transnational media, can present the Israeli regime’s attacks as a blatant violation of international law and emphasize its legitimate right to defense and deterrence. Furthermore, by portraying itself as logical, resistant, and oppressed, it can pave the way for increased regional and global empathy. Ultimately, this war can provide a platform for domestic consensus, cohesion of the Resistance Axis, and redefining Iran’s position as a responsible actor in regional security equations.
Strategic Council Online Opinion: The 12-day imposed war, which began on June 12 of this year with the Zionist regime’s invasion of Iranian soil, marked one of the darkest chapters in Iran’s contemporary history. This conflict started with Israel’s surprise attacks on Iran’s military and nuclear facilities, as well as civilian targets, including several hospitals. It was accompanied by the targeted assassinations of military commanders and prominent nuclear scientists, the destruction of Evin Prison (resulting in 71 deaths), and the bombing of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB. The direct involvement of the U.S., through the bombing of Iran’s peaceful nuclear facilities in Fordow and Isfahan, completed this tragedy. These actions not only constituted a blatant violation of international obligations, including the UN Charter, the Geneva Conventions, and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), but also imposed heavy legal and criminal responsibility on the U.S. and the Israeli regime.
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Military attack on the civilian nuclear facilities of any country that is a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) constitutes a clear violation of the United Nations Charter, international humanitarian law, and specifically the NPT.
Strategic Council Online– Opinion: International law, as a set of rules and principles governing relations between states, always emphasizes the preservation of peace, security, and sovereignty of states. One of the fundamental principles of this legal system is respect for the territorial sovereignty of states and the prohibition of violating their territorial integrity without legal authorization.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international law said: If two-thirds of the 124 member states of the International Criminal Court support the Court’s verdict to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant, it would be sufficient politically and legally. This verdict is intended to exert political and international pressure on the officials of the Zionist regime, especially Benjamin Netanyahu, so that, while condemning the actions and behavior that have been taken against the people of Gaza to date, this behavior and support for them will change in the future.
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?
Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime alone lacks the necessary and sufficient capacities to carry out belligerent policies, terror, genocide, and violence in the “long term.” What has kept this regime afloat for more than 75 years and has caused its bellicosity to continue is mainly due to two fundamental factors: First, the support of Western countries, especially the United States, for the Zionist regime, and second, the complete passivity and self-defeat of some Arab governments in the face of crimes of the Zionists.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer said legal capacities cannot be exploited without political and diplomatic resolve and action; therefore, regional and international cooperation “around the axis of the recent advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict should be placed on the agenda of the diplomatic apparatus of the new government.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the Security Council, General Assembly Human Rights Council, and other UN bodies from now on, even if they don’t want to, will have to include the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in their future statements and resolutions. Calling the Israeli regime “occupier” and referring to its illegal actions in the Occupied Territories against the Palestinians is a political and legal failure for this regime and its supporters.
Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: One of the strategic and long-term dimensions of Iran’s tough missile-drone response to the Occupied Territories will be the further withdrawal of the Zionist regime from its positions in the Gaza war.
SCFR Online – Opinion: Competition among great powers is no longer solely about oil; rather, control over rare minerals has now become the most important geopolitical arena for the global economy and technology.
SCFR Online – Opinion: The confrontation between Iran and the West has moved beyond traditional military arenas and now continues in the realm of perception, data, and artificial intelligence.
SCFR Online – Opinion: Iran’s display of power in the recent imposed war and Washington’s turning away from its traditional allies have pushed Persian Gulf countries toward new partners in the East.
SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.
SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.
SCFR Online – Note: Articles from Western think tanks confirm that, contrary to Western assumptions, the war has failed to cause Iran’s economy to collapse, and this situation has led Washington to seek a pathway for exiting the quagmire.
SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.
SCFR Online – Opinion: The recent mobilization by certain members of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council toward more active participation in NATO security arrangements should not be interpreted as a sudden shift or fundamental transformation in these countries’ foreign policies.