The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Nature of War and Nuclear Deterrence

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An international affairs expert said: The main competition between powers in the international arena in the future will be over artificial intelligence, and the winner will play a decisive role in international developments.

In an interview with the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations website about the impact of artificial intelligence on international politics, Rahman Ghahramanpour said: This technology, like nuclear technology, is fateful, history-making, and decisive. It is not comparable to the technologies of recent years, and its scope of influence is greater than that of other technologies.

He said that information technology and artificial intelligence can affect the nature of war, communications, education, politics, and economics.

Ghahramanpour, stating that the view of artificial intelligence is both optimistic and pessimistic, said: In the optimistic view, it is assumed that artificial intelligence will improve the quality of life and communications and is a positive development in order to solve a significant part of the problems for which humanity has not found a solution, but in the pessimistic view, attention is mainly paid to its negative consequences, the most important of which is removing humans from the center and focus of the changes that began 200 years ago, as the agency and centrality of the rational human being are threatened by it, and this issue has significant consequences in the social, philosophical, economic, and other fields. He continued: Therefore, even in the age of artificial intelligence, the existence of balancing forces is important; forces that resist the negative effects of artificial intelligence and try to neutralize them. For example, if we pay attention to the impact of social networks, we will see they affect people’s minds because of the specific algorithms on the basis of which these networks were designed; meantime, the issue of misinformation or misleading information by these networks has become a significant concern.

 

On the other hand, ethnic, religious, and linguistic gaps are exacerbated by the activities of social networks and create a new form of gap. This is where the existence of balancing forces that stand against the dominance of cyberspace becomes important. If these technologies are not moderated through these balancing forces, it is natural that the negative effects of artificial intelligence will be far greater than their positive effects. Ghahramanpour said: Currently, in the field of artificial intelligence, the main competition is between the United States and China, and in this rivalry, Europe, Russia, and Japan are lagging and are trying to compensate for this weakness. Japan has recently started working on microchips, South Korea and Germany have also moved in this direction, and the European Union is also creating a large-scale artificial intelligence center that will be headquartered in four European countries. The UAE and Saudi Arabia have also made significant investments in artificial intelligence in the Persian Gulf region.

He continued: “The main competition between powers in the international arena in the future will be over artificial intelligence, and the competition’s winner will determine international developments. Just as nuclear technology was effective in strengthening and maintaining American hegemony after World War II, artificial intelligence can also change global equations in the current situation. In this direction, we need to see how the United States and China can exert their dominance over artificial intelligence to change global equations in their favor.”

This international affairs expert stated that there is a consensus in the United States about containing China and that Democrats during Biden’s time believed that the best way to contain China in the field of artificial intelligence was to prevent the export of advanced or nanometer chips to China. He said: The Netherlands, South Korea, the United States, and Taiwan have a joint agreement on limiting the export of chips to China, and it seems that this policy will be followed during the Trump era.

In response to the question of how much artificial intelligence can disrupt international relations, he said: There is still no clear picture to answer this question, but what is clear is that artificial intelligence is changing the nature of war and nuclear deterrence. China is researching using quantum technology to track and identify nuclear submarines, and if this capability is achieved, the concept of strategic deterrence will change, too.

Referring to some of the applications of artificial intelligence in conventional and unconventional weapons, Ghahramanpour stated: Artificial intelligence plays a significant role in the construction of conventional pinpoint missiles, which create changes in terms of volume, power, and accuracy of destruction that act like a strategic weapon, which are called “strategic non-nuclear” weapons. Another application of this technology is in constructing anti-radar weapons, disabling radars, spying on satellites in space, and preventing satellites from receiving information, which is another issue of great importance. Emphasizing that artificial intelligence will change the face of war and trade, he said: Countries are taking rapid steps in this direction, but the scope of the changes this field will create is still unclear. This issue has become so serious that the UN Security Council has also raised the issue of setting international regulations on using artificial intelligence. If a global treaty is created in this regard, we can witness an international order limiting the use of artificial intelligence, like the era after World War II.

This international affairs expert noted that the scope of AI’s impact depends on numerous factors and the type of cooperation between governments. If major governments cooperate and establish treaties in this regard, the impact will naturally differ. Unlike nuclear technology, which has been a government monopoly, AI is in the hands of private networks and companies, and its speed of becoming public is much faster and greater than that of other technologies. Therefore, this issue can make it difficult for governments to control this technology. In addition, even for governments to understand this issue takes time, and private companies can develop AI technology at high speed and in a short time.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

The Makkah Pact; Reasons for its Formation and Challenges Ahead

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Makkah Pact, signed between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey under the motto “an attack on one is an attack on all,” is viewed by some analysts less as a full-fledged military coalition and more as an attempt to reduce security dependence on an external power and to establish a regional security mechanism.

Implications of the US-Saudi Nuclear Agreement

SCFR Online – Opinion: The new US-Saudi nuclear agreement, despite legal and political ambiguities, could alter previous non-proliferation standards in West Asia and intensify nuclear competition, ushering it into a new phase.

An Analysis of Recent Turkey-Israeli Regime Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: Recent developments in Syria indicate an intensification of strategic rivalry between Turkey and the Israeli regime, but mutual considerations and the role of the United States have limited the likelihood of direct war.

Increasing criticism of the extensive Zionist lobby network

SCFR Online – Opinion: An examination of the mechanisms of the Israeli regime’s influence in the United States depicts a complex picture of shared interests, strategic dependencies, and the limitations of this relationship.

Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact

SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?

Strategic Implications of the Reduction of US Weapons Stockpiles

SCFR Online – Opinion: The continuation of the US war against Iran, in addition to increasing operational costs, has called into question the actual capacity of the American arsenal to simultaneously fulfill security commitments on multiple fronts; an issue that affects deterrence, defense production capacity, and Washington’s resource prioritization.

The Formation of a New Order in Relations Between Powers

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Russia-Ukraine war and the war of the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran have been formed with different objectives and actors, but field and political developments indicate that they are not entirely separate from one another.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Makkah Pact; Reasons for its Formation and Challenges Ahead

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Makkah Pact, signed between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey under the motto “an attack on one is an attack on all,” is viewed by some analysts less as a full-fledged military coalition and more as an attempt to reduce security dependence on an external power and to establish a regional security mechanism.

Implications of the US-Saudi Nuclear Agreement

SCFR Online – Opinion: The new US-Saudi nuclear agreement, despite legal and political ambiguities, could alter previous non-proliferation standards in West Asia and intensify nuclear competition, ushering it into a new phase.

An Analysis of Recent Turkey-Israeli Regime Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: Recent developments in Syria indicate an intensification of strategic rivalry between Turkey and the Israeli regime, but mutual considerations and the role of the United States have limited the likelihood of direct war.

Increasing criticism of the extensive Zionist lobby network

SCFR Online – Opinion: An examination of the mechanisms of the Israeli regime’s influence in the United States depicts a complex picture of shared interests, strategic dependencies, and the limitations of this relationship.

Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact

SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?

Strategic Implications of the Reduction of US Weapons Stockpiles

SCFR Online – Opinion: The continuation of the US war against Iran, in addition to increasing operational costs, has called into question the actual capacity of the American arsenal to simultaneously fulfill security commitments on multiple fronts; an issue that affects deterrence, defense production capacity, and Washington’s resource prioritization.

The Formation of a New Order in Relations Between Powers

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Russia-Ukraine war and the war of the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran have been formed with different objectives and actors, but field and political developments indicate that they are not entirely separate from one another.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

The Makkah Pact; Reasons for its Formation and Challenges Ahead

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Makkah Pact, signed between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey under the motto “an attack on one is an attack on all,” is viewed by some analysts less as a full-fledged military coalition and more as an attempt to reduce security dependence on an external power and to establish a regional security mechanism.

Implications of the US-Saudi Nuclear Agreement

SCFR Online – Opinion: The new US-Saudi nuclear agreement, despite legal and political ambiguities, could alter previous non-proliferation standards in West Asia and intensify nuclear competition, ushering it into a new phase.

An Analysis of Recent Turkey-Israeli Regime Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: Recent developments in Syria indicate an intensification of strategic rivalry between Turkey and the Israeli regime, but mutual considerations and the role of the United States have limited the likelihood of direct war.

Increasing criticism of the extensive Zionist lobby network

SCFR Online – Opinion: An examination of the mechanisms of the Israeli regime’s influence in the United States depicts a complex picture of shared interests, strategic dependencies, and the limitations of this relationship.

Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact

SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?

Strategic Implications of the Reduction of US Weapons Stockpiles

SCFR Online – Opinion: The continuation of the US war against Iran, in addition to increasing operational costs, has called into question the actual capacity of the American arsenal to simultaneously fulfill security commitments on multiple fronts; an issue that affects deterrence, defense production capacity, and Washington’s resource prioritization.

The Formation of a New Order in Relations Between Powers

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Russia-Ukraine war and the war of the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran have been formed with different objectives and actors, but field and political developments indicate that they are not entirely separate from one another.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

The Makkah Pact; Reasons for its Formation and Challenges Ahead

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Makkah Pact, signed between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey under the motto “an attack on one is an attack on all,” is viewed by some analysts less as a full-fledged military coalition and more as an attempt to reduce security dependence on an external power and to establish a regional security mechanism.

Implications of the US-Saudi Nuclear Agreement

SCFR Online – Opinion: The new US-Saudi nuclear agreement, despite legal and political ambiguities, could alter previous non-proliferation standards in West Asia and intensify nuclear competition, ushering it into a new phase.

An Analysis of Recent Turkey-Israeli Regime Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: Recent developments in Syria indicate an intensification of strategic rivalry between Turkey and the Israeli regime, but mutual considerations and the role of the United States have limited the likelihood of direct war.

Increasing criticism of the extensive Zionist lobby network

SCFR Online – Opinion: An examination of the mechanisms of the Israeli regime’s influence in the United States depicts a complex picture of shared interests, strategic dependencies, and the limitations of this relationship.

Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact

SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?

Strategic Implications of the Reduction of US Weapons Stockpiles

SCFR Online – Opinion: The continuation of the US war against Iran, in addition to increasing operational costs, has called into question the actual capacity of the American arsenal to simultaneously fulfill security commitments on multiple fronts; an issue that affects deterrence, defense production capacity, and Washington’s resource prioritization.

The Formation of a New Order in Relations Between Powers

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Russia-Ukraine war and the war of the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran have been formed with different objectives and actors, but field and political developments indicate that they are not entirely separate from one another.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

The Makkah Pact; Reasons for its Formation and Challenges Ahead

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Makkah Pact, signed between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey under the motto “an attack on one is an attack on all,” is viewed by some analysts less as a full-fledged military coalition and more as an attempt to reduce security dependence on an external power and to establish a regional security mechanism.

Implications of the US-Saudi Nuclear Agreement

SCFR Online – Opinion: The new US-Saudi nuclear agreement, despite legal and political ambiguities, could alter previous non-proliferation standards in West Asia and intensify nuclear competition, ushering it into a new phase.

An Analysis of Recent Turkey-Israeli Regime Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: Recent developments in Syria indicate an intensification of strategic rivalry between Turkey and the Israeli regime, but mutual considerations and the role of the United States have limited the likelihood of direct war.

Increasing criticism of the extensive Zionist lobby network

SCFR Online – Opinion: An examination of the mechanisms of the Israeli regime’s influence in the United States depicts a complex picture of shared interests, strategic dependencies, and the limitations of this relationship.

Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact

SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?

Strategic Implications of the Reduction of US Weapons Stockpiles

SCFR Online – Opinion: The continuation of the US war against Iran, in addition to increasing operational costs, has called into question the actual capacity of the American arsenal to simultaneously fulfill security commitments on multiple fronts; an issue that affects deterrence, defense production capacity, and Washington’s resource prioritization.

The Formation of a New Order in Relations Between Powers

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Russia-Ukraine war and the war of the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran have been formed with different objectives and actors, but field and political developments indicate that they are not entirely separate from one another.

Loading