Dr. Seyyed Kamal Kharrazi made the remark in a meeting today with Ziyad al-Nakhalah, the Secretary General of the Islamic Jihad Movement.
Dr. Kharrazi said that it is an important point that the United Nations has branded the Zionist regime as an apartheid regime.
“The law of nature dictates that the destiny of apartheid regimes is concluded in collapse”.
The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations added that support for the Islamic resistance in Palestine is part of the macro strategy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, adding that the Zionist regime today is encircled by the axis of resistance and “if you put yourself in the Zionist shoes, you will understand to what extent they are worried about their survival.”
Emphasizing the rise of the power of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the resistance movement in the region, he said “what is heard today under the title of normalization of relations between some Arab countries and the Zionist regime, is only the disclosure of the confidential relations those countries have had with the Zionist regime. In the past, those countries did not give any practical support to Palestine, but paved the way for compromises with Israel”.
Referring to the recent visit by US President Biden to the Middle East, Kharrazi said Biden’s visit was a failure and did not bring any achievement.
“This situation well suggests that the Zionist regime is facing problems domestically,” he said, pointing to the efforts by the Zionist regime to exploit Biden’s visit as a propaganda campaign.
In this meeting, Ziyad al-Nakhalah, the Secretary General of the Islamic Jihad Movement, explained the conditions on the ground in Palestine and the encouraging status of the Palestinian resistance forces.
He also appreciated the unwavering support provided by the Islamic Republic of Iran to the resistance movement and the cause of Palestine and gave assurances that resistance forces across the region would mark the final victory against the Zionist regime with the assistance of the Almighty God.
Dr. Kharrazi in a meeting with the Secretary General of the Islamic Jihad Movement: The collapse of the Zionist regime is definite

LATEST CONTENT
The Makkah Pact; Reasons for its Formation and Challenges Ahead
SCFR Online – Opinion: The Makkah Pact, signed between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey under the motto “an attack on one is an attack on all,” is viewed by some analysts less as a full-fledged military coalition and more as an attempt to reduce security dependence on an external power and to establish a regional security mechanism.
Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact
SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?
Últimas publicaciones
The Makkah Pact; Reasons for its Formation and Challenges Ahead
SCFR Online – Opinion: The Makkah Pact, signed between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey under the motto “an attack on one is an attack on all,” is viewed by some analysts less as a full-fledged military coalition and more as an attempt to reduce security dependence on an external power and to establish a regional security mechanism.
Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact
SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?
DERNIER CONTENU
The Makkah Pact; Reasons for its Formation and Challenges Ahead
SCFR Online – Opinion: The Makkah Pact, signed between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey under the motto “an attack on one is an attack on all,” is viewed by some analysts less as a full-fledged military coalition and more as an attempt to reduce security dependence on an external power and to establish a regional security mechanism.
Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact
SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?
DERNIER CONTENU
The Makkah Pact; Reasons for its Formation and Challenges Ahead
SCFR Online – Opinion: The Makkah Pact, signed between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey under the motto “an attack on one is an attack on all,” is viewed by some analysts less as a full-fledged military coalition and more as an attempt to reduce security dependence on an external power and to establish a regional security mechanism.
Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact
SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?
DERNIER CONTENU
The Makkah Pact; Reasons for its Formation and Challenges Ahead
SCFR Online – Opinion: The Makkah Pact, signed between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey under the motto “an attack on one is an attack on all,” is viewed by some analysts less as a full-fledged military coalition and more as an attempt to reduce security dependence on an external power and to establish a regional security mechanism.
Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact
SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?
0 Comments