Potentials for Improvement of Iran-Tajikistan Relations; Obstacles Ahead

2020/10/11 | Note, Politics, Top News

Strategic Council Online - There are countries in the region that envy Iran-Tajikistan relations, the historical background and understanding that the two governments and the two nations have of each other, and are seeking to destroy such relations. Under these circumstances, Iran and Tajikistan should expand their relations and act vigilantly to resolve the prevailing claims and disputes. Dr Abdolreza Faraji Rad - Expert on Geopolitical Affairs

On Friday, September 25, Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned Mr Nizamuddin Zahedi, Ambassador of the Republic of Tajikistan to the Ministry, for a second time in a week. The news was somewhat shocking considering the open process of reorganizing relations between the two Persian-speaking countries. In the statement “baseless allegations and irresponsible behaviour of Tajik state television” was cited as the main reason for “summoning the ambassador and conveying strong protest of the Islamic Republic of Iran.” The cause of the protest was the broadcast of a so-called documentary series on Tajik state television entitled “Betrayal”, in which false and biased accusations were made against the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Now, despite such issues, it is necessary to look at the history of relations between the two Persian-speaking countries and emphasize the need for vigilance on the part of the officials of the two countries to prevent escalation of such disputes.

Iran and Tajikistan are two independent states but in fact, people in no other two countries are so close to each other; either in historical, cultural, scientific or arts fields. Therefore, there is much interest between the people of the two countries. Since Tajikistan’s independence, Iran has been one of the first countries to recognize that country, and good relations were established between Tehran and Dushanbe from the very beginning. This good relationship has continued despite some ups and downs in recent years. As in the past decades, the two countries enjoyed close relations; but recently these relations have experienced some ups and downs, although it is not possible to speak of a hostile relationship between the two countries. There are some misunderstandings between Iran and Tajikistan, such as the film recently aired on Tajik television. It has been claimed in the film that some Iranian agents are contributing to the activities of the Islamists (according to them, terrorists) in that country. I do not think that in the government of the Islamic Republic or among the people there would be any interest to cause a difficulty or problem in Tajikistan. Therefore, some countries that have problems with Iran would incite some people in the name of Iran to take measures to destroy the relations between the two countries. There are countries in the region that are jealous of the relations between Iran and Tajikistan, the historical background and the understanding that the two governments and the two nations have of each other, and are seeking to destroy these relations. Under such circumstances, Iran and Tajikistan should expand their relations and act vigilantly to resolve claims and disputes.

At a time when relations between Tehran and Dushanbe were greatly improving, foreigners raised such issues in the news, and in the meantime, Saudi Arabia tried to get closer to Tajikistan to keep it away from Iran; but the Dushanbe government understood the case very well and, except for a short period, did not allow the relations to be destroyed at all. In this regard, during the last one or two years, Mr Rouhani visited Tajikistan and various issues were discussed during the visit. Unfortunately, US sanctions did not allow the agreements reached during that trip to be properly implemented; because flights were cancelled, traders could not travel, and cultural works were somewhat halted. Under this situation, the two governments of Iran and Tajikistan should be careful that some countries intend to destroy their relations and therefore should prevent its realization.

In general, countries such as Iran, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan can take many joint actions with each other. At present, relations between Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, which were previously strained, have improved significantly, which is a turning point in the progress of the measures of the three countries. It should be noted that Tajikistan and Uzbekistan have no access to the high seas, so Iran could be their connection point to the international waters. Agreements have been reached with Uzbekistan in this regard, but have not been implemented yet. It is hoped that agreements will be reached with Tajikistan in this regard.

Finally, it should not be overlooked that both Iran and Tajikistan are interested in expanding relations, and their governments and nations have repeatedly shown this interest. In fact, Iran and Tajikistan can become a model for other countries, such as Afghanistan and Uzbekistan, whose cultures are close to these two countries, and these four countries can take steps towards expansion and improvement of relations.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Consequences of Declining Trust in the Judiciary in Europe

SCFRonline – Opinion: The increase in public distrust of the French judicial system, which in recent surveys has reached approximately two-thirds of citizens, should be analyzed within a framework broader than temporary dissatisfaction or an emotional reaction to a particular criminal case.

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Consequences of Declining Trust in the Judiciary in Europe

SCFRonline – Opinion: The increase in public distrust of the French judicial system, which in recent surveys has reached approximately two-thirds of citizens, should be analyzed within a framework broader than temporary dissatisfaction or an emotional reaction to a particular criminal case.

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Consequences of Declining Trust in the Judiciary in Europe

SCFRonline – Opinion: The increase in public distrust of the French judicial system, which in recent surveys has reached approximately two-thirds of citizens, should be analyzed within a framework broader than temporary dissatisfaction or an emotional reaction to a particular criminal case.

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Consequences of Declining Trust in the Judiciary in Europe

SCFRonline – Opinion: The increase in public distrust of the French judicial system, which in recent surveys has reached approximately two-thirds of citizens, should be analyzed within a framework broader than temporary dissatisfaction or an emotional reaction to a particular criminal case.

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Consequences of Declining Trust in the Judiciary in Europe

SCFRonline – Opinion: The increase in public distrust of the French judicial system, which in recent surveys has reached approximately two-thirds of citizens, should be analyzed within a framework broader than temporary dissatisfaction or an emotional reaction to a particular criminal case.

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

Loading