Cyber Regionalism, a Response to Intra-Civilizational Dialogue

2019/02/03 | Opinion, Science & Culture

Strategic Council Online: A professor of international relations believes that the elites of the Muslim World can use the opportunity provided by the cyberspace to forge a common understanding of the differences and commonalities in the Islamic World.

Dr. Mohammad Reza Dehshiri, an Iranian professor of international relations in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, added: “The existing opportunity in the cyberspace is to the extent that creation of cultural regionalism can be the best way for intra-civilizational dialogue in the Muslim World.”

Stressing the need for intra-civilizational dialogue in the Islamic World, he underlined the role the statesmen play in this respect. “Statesmen in the Muslim countries should open the space for dialogue rather than blocking it.”

Dehshiri hailed the “important role” that political elites play in realization of intra-civilizational dialogue and noted: “The best way is to establish academic communication between the elites of Islamic countries and launching sabbatical leaves for Iranian professors in Arab countries and the vice versa so that through direct talks between the elites the misunderstandings could be removed.

Noting that scientific elites can identify common borders and turn differences into friendships in various sectors, including using art and language, he said. “For example, by working in areas such as theater, music, and cinema, common grounds and points of differences can be identified and efforts can be made to eliminate or reduce the discrepancies.”

Regretting that due to political hurdles in the Islamic countries, it was not possible for political elites to exchange visits and establish close contacts, Dehshiri proposed that the Muslim World elites use the cyberspace to provide a suitable platform for intra-civilizational dialogue.

Noting that the commonalities of Muslims including Islam itself, the Quran and Kaaba were effective factors in intra-civilizational dialogue, the university instructor meantime emphasized that the important thing in Islamic civilization is the role of the elites and theorists in the Islamic World. Of course, these dialogues should be peaceful and not exclamatory or hostile and the parties should be committed to the requirements of the dialogue, otherwise, it would yield no results.

In conclusion, Dehshiri referred to the West’s attempts to spread Islamophobia and portray a violent and extremist image of Islam and said: “Muslim elites can offer a moderate and rational image of Islam through inter-civilizational dialogue and show the West that Islam is the religion of peace and moderation, as well as dialogue with other religions.”

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Indicators for Choosing Between War and Diplomacy

SCFR Online – Opinion: Foreign policy analysis is valid when it evaluates decisions based on the information and circumstances prevailing at the time they were made, not on the basis of outcomes that only become apparent after the crisis has ended.

The war of narratives; a tool for geopolitical competition

Strategic Council Online – Note: In today’s global politics, the creation of narratives has become as important as territorial control and economic management, and has turned into the main tool of great power competition.

Analysis of the Recognition of the Armenian Genocide by the Zionist Regime

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when the West Asia region, particularly in recent months, has been undergoing the most complex political and security developments of the past half-century, the sudden decision by the cabinet of the Zionist regime to recognize the Armenian genocide committed by Turkey, which has faced strong condemnation and opposition from Ankara and Baku, raises questions.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Indicators for Choosing Between War and Diplomacy

SCFR Online – Opinion: Foreign policy analysis is valid when it evaluates decisions based on the information and circumstances prevailing at the time they were made, not on the basis of outcomes that only become apparent after the crisis has ended.

The war of narratives; a tool for geopolitical competition

Strategic Council Online – Note: In today’s global politics, the creation of narratives has become as important as territorial control and economic management, and has turned into the main tool of great power competition.

Analysis of the Recognition of the Armenian Genocide by the Zionist Regime

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when the West Asia region, particularly in recent months, has been undergoing the most complex political and security developments of the past half-century, the sudden decision by the cabinet of the Zionist regime to recognize the Armenian genocide committed by Turkey, which has faced strong condemnation and opposition from Ankara and Baku, raises questions.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Indicators for Choosing Between War and Diplomacy

SCFR Online – Opinion: Foreign policy analysis is valid when it evaluates decisions based on the information and circumstances prevailing at the time they were made, not on the basis of outcomes that only become apparent after the crisis has ended.

The war of narratives; a tool for geopolitical competition

Strategic Council Online – Note: In today’s global politics, the creation of narratives has become as important as territorial control and economic management, and has turned into the main tool of great power competition.

Analysis of the Recognition of the Armenian Genocide by the Zionist Regime

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when the West Asia region, particularly in recent months, has been undergoing the most complex political and security developments of the past half-century, the sudden decision by the cabinet of the Zionist regime to recognize the Armenian genocide committed by Turkey, which has faced strong condemnation and opposition from Ankara and Baku, raises questions.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Indicators for Choosing Between War and Diplomacy

SCFR Online – Opinion: Foreign policy analysis is valid when it evaluates decisions based on the information and circumstances prevailing at the time they were made, not on the basis of outcomes that only become apparent after the crisis has ended.

The war of narratives; a tool for geopolitical competition

Strategic Council Online – Note: In today’s global politics, the creation of narratives has become as important as territorial control and economic management, and has turned into the main tool of great power competition.

Analysis of the Recognition of the Armenian Genocide by the Zionist Regime

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when the West Asia region, particularly in recent months, has been undergoing the most complex political and security developments of the past half-century, the sudden decision by the cabinet of the Zionist regime to recognize the Armenian genocide committed by Turkey, which has faced strong condemnation and opposition from Ankara and Baku, raises questions.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Indicators for Choosing Between War and Diplomacy

SCFR Online – Opinion: Foreign policy analysis is valid when it evaluates decisions based on the information and circumstances prevailing at the time they were made, not on the basis of outcomes that only become apparent after the crisis has ended.

The war of narratives; a tool for geopolitical competition

Strategic Council Online – Note: In today’s global politics, the creation of narratives has become as important as territorial control and economic management, and has turned into the main tool of great power competition.

Analysis of the Recognition of the Armenian Genocide by the Zionist Regime

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when the West Asia region, particularly in recent months, has been undergoing the most complex political and security developments of the past half-century, the sudden decision by the cabinet of the Zionist regime to recognize the Armenian genocide committed by Turkey, which has faced strong condemnation and opposition from Ankara and Baku, raises questions.

Loading