جدیدترین مطالب

The Outlook for Iran-US Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: After months of war and economic pressure, the situation between Iran and the United States has been placed between two conflicting logics; Washington insists on intensifying pressure to gain concessions, and Tehran does not accept negotiations under pressure.

Loading

International Court of Justice

An Analysis of Calling the Zionist Regime “Occupier” by the International Court of Justice

An Analysis of Calling the Zionist Regime “Occupier” by the International Court of Justice

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the Security Council, General Assembly Human Rights Council, and other UN bodies from now on, even if they don’t want to, will have to include the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in their future statements and resolutions. Calling the Israeli regime “occupier” and referring to its illegal actions in the Occupied Territories against the Palestinians is a political and legal failure for this regime and its supporters.

South Africa Political-Legal Counterattack at Zionist Regime Genocide, Expectations from Regional Countries

South Africa Political-Legal Counterattack at Zionist Regime Genocide, Expectations from Regional Countries

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer said: South Africa’s success in filing a lawsuit against the Zionist regime in the International Court of Justice is capable of immediate destruction of the image of that regime, the tool to maintain it, justification of the crimes of the regime, the main lever of its lobbies, achievements of its propaganda and psychological warfare, its “security building” capacity and the political future of its statesmen.

أحدث الوظائف

The Outlook for Iran-US Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: After months of war and economic pressure, the situation between Iran and the United States has been placed between two conflicting logics; Washington insists on intensifying pressure to gain concessions, and Tehran does not accept negotiations under pressure.

Loading

International Court of Justice

An Analysis of Calling the Zionist Regime “Occupier” by the International Court of Justice

An Analysis of Calling the Zionist Regime “Occupier” by the International Court of Justice

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the Security Council, General Assembly Human Rights Council, and other UN bodies from now on, even if they don’t want to, will have to include the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in their future statements and resolutions. Calling the Israeli regime “occupier” and referring to its illegal actions in the Occupied Territories against the Palestinians is a political and legal failure for this regime and its supporters.

South Africa Political-Legal Counterattack at Zionist Regime Genocide, Expectations from Regional Countries

South Africa Political-Legal Counterattack at Zionist Regime Genocide, Expectations from Regional Countries

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer said: South Africa’s success in filing a lawsuit against the Zionist regime in the International Court of Justice is capable of immediate destruction of the image of that regime, the tool to maintain it, justification of the crimes of the regime, the main lever of its lobbies, achievements of its propaganda and psychological warfare, its “security building” capacity and the political future of its statesmen.

International Court of Justice

An Analysis of Calling the Zionist Regime “Occupier” by the International Court of Justice

An Analysis of Calling the Zionist Regime “Occupier” by the International Court of Justice

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the Security Council, General Assembly Human Rights Council, and other UN bodies from now on, even if they don’t want to, will have to include the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in their future statements and resolutions. Calling the Israeli regime “occupier” and referring to its illegal actions in the Occupied Territories against the Palestinians is a political and legal failure for this regime and its supporters.

South Africa Political-Legal Counterattack at Zionist Regime Genocide, Expectations from Regional Countries

South Africa Political-Legal Counterattack at Zionist Regime Genocide, Expectations from Regional Countries

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer said: South Africa’s success in filing a lawsuit against the Zionist regime in the International Court of Justice is capable of immediate destruction of the image of that regime, the tool to maintain it, justification of the crimes of the regime, the main lever of its lobbies, achievements of its propaganda and psychological warfare, its “security building” capacity and the political future of its statesmen.

LATEST CONTENT

The Outlook for Iran-US Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: After months of war and economic pressure, the situation between Iran and the United States has been placed between two conflicting logics; Washington insists on intensifying pressure to gain concessions, and Tehran does not accept negotiations under pressure.

Loading

International Court of Justice

An Analysis of Calling the Zionist Regime “Occupier” by the International Court of Justice

An Analysis of Calling the Zionist Regime “Occupier” by the International Court of Justice

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the Security Council, General Assembly Human Rights Council, and other UN bodies from now on, even if they don’t want to, will have to include the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in their future statements and resolutions. Calling the Israeli regime “occupier” and referring to its illegal actions in the Occupied Territories against the Palestinians is a political and legal failure for this regime and its supporters.

South Africa Political-Legal Counterattack at Zionist Regime Genocide, Expectations from Regional Countries

South Africa Political-Legal Counterattack at Zionist Regime Genocide, Expectations from Regional Countries

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer said: South Africa’s success in filing a lawsuit against the Zionist regime in the International Court of Justice is capable of immediate destruction of the image of that regime, the tool to maintain it, justification of the crimes of the regime, the main lever of its lobbies, achievements of its propaganda and psychological warfare, its “security building” capacity and the political future of its statesmen.

ÚLTIMAS PUBLICACIONES

The Outlook for Iran-US Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: After months of war and economic pressure, the situation between Iran and the United States has been placed between two conflicting logics; Washington insists on intensifying pressure to gain concessions, and Tehran does not accept negotiations under pressure.

Loading

International Court of Justice

An Analysis of Calling the Zionist Regime “Occupier” by the International Court of Justice

An Analysis of Calling the Zionist Regime “Occupier” by the International Court of Justice

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the Security Council, General Assembly Human Rights Council, and other UN bodies from now on, even if they don’t want to, will have to include the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in their future statements and resolutions. Calling the Israeli regime “occupier” and referring to its illegal actions in the Occupied Territories against the Palestinians is a political and legal failure for this regime and its supporters.

South Africa Political-Legal Counterattack at Zionist Regime Genocide, Expectations from Regional Countries

South Africa Political-Legal Counterattack at Zionist Regime Genocide, Expectations from Regional Countries

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer said: South Africa’s success in filing a lawsuit against the Zionist regime in the International Court of Justice is capable of immediate destruction of the image of that regime, the tool to maintain it, justification of the crimes of the regime, the main lever of its lobbies, achievements of its propaganda and psychological warfare, its “security building” capacity and the political future of its statesmen.

ÚLTIMAS PUBLICACIONES

The Outlook for Iran-US Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: After months of war and economic pressure, the situation between Iran and the United States has been placed between two conflicting logics; Washington insists on intensifying pressure to gain concessions, and Tehran does not accept negotiations under pressure.

Loading

International Court of Justice

An Analysis of Calling the Zionist Regime “Occupier” by the International Court of Justice

An Analysis of Calling the Zionist Regime “Occupier” by the International Court of Justice

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the Security Council, General Assembly Human Rights Council, and other UN bodies from now on, even if they don’t want to, will have to include the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in their future statements and resolutions. Calling the Israeli regime “occupier” and referring to its illegal actions in the Occupied Territories against the Palestinians is a political and legal failure for this regime and its supporters.

South Africa Political-Legal Counterattack at Zionist Regime Genocide, Expectations from Regional Countries

South Africa Political-Legal Counterattack at Zionist Regime Genocide, Expectations from Regional Countries

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer said: South Africa’s success in filing a lawsuit against the Zionist regime in the International Court of Justice is capable of immediate destruction of the image of that regime, the tool to maintain it, justification of the crimes of the regime, the main lever of its lobbies, achievements of its propaganda and psychological warfare, its “security building” capacity and the political future of its statesmen.

ÚLTIMAS PUBLICACIONES

The Outlook for Iran-US Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: After months of war and economic pressure, the situation between Iran and the United States has been placed between two conflicting logics; Washington insists on intensifying pressure to gain concessions, and Tehran does not accept negotiations under pressure.

Loading

International Court of Justice

An Analysis of Calling the Zionist Regime “Occupier” by the International Court of Justice

An Analysis of Calling the Zionist Regime “Occupier” by the International Court of Justice

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the Security Council, General Assembly Human Rights Council, and other UN bodies from now on, even if they don’t want to, will have to include the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in their future statements and resolutions. Calling the Israeli regime “occupier” and referring to its illegal actions in the Occupied Territories against the Palestinians is a political and legal failure for this regime and its supporters.

South Africa Political-Legal Counterattack at Zionist Regime Genocide, Expectations from Regional Countries

South Africa Political-Legal Counterattack at Zionist Regime Genocide, Expectations from Regional Countries

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer said: South Africa’s success in filing a lawsuit against the Zionist regime in the International Court of Justice is capable of immediate destruction of the image of that regime, the tool to maintain it, justification of the crimes of the regime, the main lever of its lobbies, achievements of its propaganda and psychological warfare, its “security building” capacity and the political future of its statesmen.

ÚLTIMAS PUBLICACIONES

The Outlook for Iran-US Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: After months of war and economic pressure, the situation between Iran and the United States has been placed between two conflicting logics; Washington insists on intensifying pressure to gain concessions, and Tehran does not accept negotiations under pressure.

Loading