Trump and the Humiliation of Europe in the Ukraine Crisis

2025/08/30 | interview, Politics, Top News

Strategic Council Online - Interview: A senior international affairs analyst stated that Trump's deal-oriented and authoritarian diplomacy, disregarding the complexities of a multipolar world, is doomed to failure. Lasting peace in Ukraine will only be possible through cooperation with Europe and respect for international law. Donald Trump, the President of the United States, with a deal-oriented approach aimed at quickly ending the war in Ukraine, has increased pressure on Europe to accept primary responsibility for that country's security guarantees. According to a Politico report, senior Pentagon officials, in meetings with European defense ministers, emphasized that the U.S. would play a minimal role in this regard, with the main burden falling on Europe. This approach, evident at the August 18 meeting in Washington with European leaders and Volodymyr Zelenskyy, highlights a deep rift in transatlantic relations. Europe, concerned about the diminishing U.S. commitments to NATO and the fragility of the peace, is seeking security independence and strengthening its own diplomacy.

Trump’s Authoritarian Diplomacy

Jalal Khoshchehreh, in an interview with the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations’ website, stated that Donald Trump’s approach to the Ukraine crisis is a sign of “the illusion of returning to the bipolar order of the Cold War.” He believes that “the U.S. President, with an authoritarian view and relying on the economic and military superiority of the United States, is trying to dictate an imposed peace not only to Ukraine but also to Europe and even Russia.”

Khoshchehreh says: “Trump imagines that with the surrender model, where the superior power imposes conditions on others, he can engineer global equations.” This analyst referred to historical examples, saying: “When the Soviet army attacked Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and Poland, the West was forced to accept this situation. But today’s world is no longer that bipolar world. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the emergence of new actors like China and West Asian countries have made the equations more complex.” This expert emphasizes that “America’s unilateral efforts to impose peace, as seen in the Alaska summit or the Washington meetings, will face resistance from Europe and even Putin.” In Khoshchehreh’s view, this authoritarian diplomacy “cannot lead to lasting peace.”

Referring to Europe’s historical role as an architect of global diplomacy, Khoshchehreh believes that Europe, contrary to Trump’s perception, cannot merely play the role of America’s assistant. He says: “Europe, especially Britain and France, with their long history in diplomacy, will not accept being marginalized.” According to the international affairs analyst, “Although Europe has been under American influence in many cases since the Cold War and even after the formation of the European Union, it will now resist an imposed peace that jeopardizes Ukraine’s territorial integrity or leads to a clear Russian victory.”

Khoshchehreh points to the London meeting and Europe’s efforts to reduce its dependence on America, adding: “Europeans, by increasing defense budgets and proposing ideas like nuclear weapons sharing, have shown that they are seeking strategic independence from America.” He believes that Britain, as the “father of global diplomacy,” and France, with its Gaullist legacy, are unlikely to submit to American hegemony and Trump’s authoritarian diplomacy. This analyst emphasizes that “Europe, especially in the Ukraine crisis, is trying to play a more active role and avoid being humiliated in peace negotiations.”

Complex Equations of Ukraine: Peace or Surrender?

According to Khoshchehreh, the Ukraine crisis, beyond a regional conflict, is an arena for the confrontation of major powers. This expert believes that “Trump’s campaign promises to end the war in a few days, a few weeks, or even a month or two are more of a show than reality.” Khoshchehreh says: “Trump is seeking the Nobel Peace Prize, but this naive view of geopolitics, where he thinks he can impose peace by relying on military and economic power, is not compatible with the realities of today’s world.”

He points to the previous diplomatic failures of Trump’s second administration, such as unimplemented agreements in Lebanon and West Asia, to failures in managing crises in Africa and Asia, and specifically the ongoing massacre in Gaza, saying: “Lasting peace requires continuous diplomacy and international consensus, not unilateral imposition.” The international affairs analyst warns that “America’s efforts to reach an agreement with Russia at the expense of Ukraine’s territorial integrity and the humiliation of Europe will not only not lead to peace but could also escalate tensions.” Khoshchehreh points to “the role of regional actors like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, which, with their pragmatic diplomacy, have refused to accept America’s imposed policies and Trump’s authoritarian diplomacy, just as Europe will ultimately not submit to Washington’s dictates for ending the war in Ukraine in favor of U.S. interests and Trump’s ill-considered goals.”

Transatlantic Relations and the Future of European Security

Khoshchehreh sees U.S.-Europe relations as the backbone of the transatlantic order but believes that Trump’s unilateral approach has endangered this relationship. Referring to the 1.2 trillion euro trade volume between the U.S. and Europe in 2022, he emphasizes that Europe is America’s largest trading partner and a key market for companies such as Apple, Google, and Tesla.

According to this expert, “Europe, despite its security dependence on NATO, has significant economic and diplomatic power and cannot be marginalized.” Khoshchehreh believes that “although  America’s efforts to create a rift between the eastern and western members of the European Union were somewhat successful, the European Union has maintained its cohesion.” He notes that “if Trump continues his authoritarian policies, Europe may move towards greater security independence, something that could fundamentally change the global order.” In conclusion, Khoshchehreh states that “Trump’s deal-oriented and authoritarian diplomacy, disregarding the complexities of a multipolar world, is doomed to failure, and lasting peace in Ukraine will only be possible through cooperation with Europe and respect for international law.”

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

The Components of Iran’s Deterrence Power

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

The Components of Iran’s Deterrence Power

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

The Components of Iran’s Deterrence Power

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

The Components of Iran’s Deterrence Power

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

The Components of Iran’s Deterrence Power

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.

Loading