Dealing with Russian Threats; Germany’s New Strategy in Competition with France

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: In recent days, some high-ranking German officials have made unprecedented comments about the urgency and scope of Russia's threats against their country.

Dr. Majid Mohammad Sharifi – Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, Kharazmi University

In a statement, the German Federal Government Intelligence Service head, Bruno Kall, claimed that the Russian threat to Germany is closer than thought and is likely to be carried out in the coming years. He stated at the hearing of the Bundestag parliamentary control committee: “It seems that the Russian armed forces will try to prepare for an attack on NATO member states by the end of this decade at the latest. The Kremlin sees Germany as an enemy because Berlin is Ukraine’s second largest supporter in the war against Russia. Germany is now in a direct military confrontation with Russia. Vladimir Putin is not only looking for the obliteration of Ukraine but also the establishment of a new world order. Russia’s activities have expanded in an unprecedented way, and it is expected that Putin will put the red lines of the West to the test.

In addition, Thomas Aldenwang, head of the German Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, also warned against increasing Russian activities in Germany. He also claimed, “In recent years, the aggressive actions of the Russian intelligence services have increased. Russia’s espionage and sabotage operations show an increasing trend both quantitatively and qualitatively. Martina Rosenberg, head of Germany’s Federal Military Counterintelligence Service (BAMAD), also pointed out the existence of such threats from Moscow. He also emphasized in a warning tone: “The number of Russian espionage operations to attack Germany’s critical infrastructure has reached an alarming level. Russia’s actions are focused on the German Ministry of Defense. This concentration aims to monitor the transfer of German weapons to Ukraine, training or weapons projects, and finally, to transmit a sense of insecurity through sabotage actions.

The above statements prove that Germany and other European NATO member countries interpret the Russian threat more seriously and urgently. Such words cannot be considered only an exaggeration or an attempt to make Russia more secure. It seems that European countries are worried about the dangers of any possible military conflict with Russia in the near future, and they are trying to prepare for such a possibility by collaborating and carrying out joint military initiatives.

The prolongation of the war in Ukraine without a prospect of its end has gradually increased the security concerns of the European countries that are members of NATO. Before this, the perception of the urgency and scope of Russia’s threat had caused Finland and Sweden to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Also, due to Russia’s threat, the number of NATO member states that allocated 2% of their GDP to defense and security jumped from 8 to 23 countries. Germany, which previously avoided any participation in military plans or initiatives in Europe, has now become the second supplier of military equipment to Ukraine and assumes more military roles due to Russia’s threat. All these developments show the European countries’ acceptance of the urgency of Russia’s threat, especially Germany.

What is most important to pay attention to is that it seems the fear of Donald Trump’s possible victory in the US presidential elections has darkened the horizons of European countries. Due to the previous cooperation experience with Trump, these countries are worried about weakening standard security organizations and institutions such as NATO. The possibility of Trump’s appeasement with Putin and the end of US military support to Ukraine has caused European countries to look for alternative ways to deal with Russia. The comments of German officials and other European countries show that European leaders interpret Russia’s threat differently from America. Undoubtedly, having long borders with Russia and unpleasant historical experiences are the most important factors in forming this different perception. Germany and other European countries are preparing for the period of the post-American security order in Europe due to this different perception and concern about the uncertainty of the US military support for Ukraine and the possibility of weakening the trans-Atlantic security cooperation during the Trump era.

In the meantime, Olaf Schultz’s government seems to have considered a different role for Germany in the new European security order in a different approach from Angela Merkel’s government. With Britain’s exit from the European Union, France and Germany are seeking to play the role of leadership and guarding the security order of Europe. Germany intends to surpass France in this regard. It can be predicted that in the coming years, Germany’s role and orientation in European military initiatives, especially in dealing with Russian threats, will experience significant changes.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

Consequences of Declining Trust in the Judiciary in Europe

SCFRonline – Opinion: The increase in public distrust of the French judicial system, which in recent surveys has reached approximately two-thirds of citizens, should be analyzed within a framework broader than temporary dissatisfaction or an emotional reaction to a particular criminal case.

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Consequences of Declining Trust in the Judiciary in Europe

SCFRonline – Opinion: The increase in public distrust of the French judicial system, which in recent surveys has reached approximately two-thirds of citizens, should be analyzed within a framework broader than temporary dissatisfaction or an emotional reaction to a particular criminal case.

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Consequences of Declining Trust in the Judiciary in Europe

SCFRonline – Opinion: The increase in public distrust of the French judicial system, which in recent surveys has reached approximately two-thirds of citizens, should be analyzed within a framework broader than temporary dissatisfaction or an emotional reaction to a particular criminal case.

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Consequences of Declining Trust in the Judiciary in Europe

SCFRonline – Opinion: The increase in public distrust of the French judicial system, which in recent surveys has reached approximately two-thirds of citizens, should be analyzed within a framework broader than temporary dissatisfaction or an emotional reaction to a particular criminal case.

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Consequences of Declining Trust in the Judiciary in Europe

SCFRonline – Opinion: The increase in public distrust of the French judicial system, which in recent surveys has reached approximately two-thirds of citizens, should be analyzed within a framework broader than temporary dissatisfaction or an emotional reaction to a particular criminal case.

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

Loading