Afghanistan Peace Talks and Challenges Ahead

2021/03/27 | Note, Politics, Top News

Strategic Council Online - Given that the Taliban are only thinking of returning Afghanistan to its dictatorship through the formation of the Islamic Emirate and want power only in the hands of this group, it will be very unlikely for peace talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban to succeed. Mohammad Reza Asgari Moroudi – senior expert in Asia affairs

The start of the peace talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban in September 2020 in Doha could be considered the most important event of the past year.

Although the process of inter-Afghan talks in Qatar was expected to move forward given the circumstances of the two sides in the conflict (the Afghan government and the Taliban), but the talks have stalled as the Taliban obstructed and conditioned the process on the implementation of the US commitments in the February 2020 peace agreement with the group.

The Taliban have conditioned any progress in the peace talks with the Afghan government for putting an end to the war and establishing a ceasefire in the country on the fulfillment of the US commitments, the most important of which is the complete withdrawal of foreign troops from Afghanistan.

On the contrary, the government of Afghanistan considers continuation of the Taliban violence in Afghanistan and linking implementation of the US commitments in the peace agreement with the Taliban to the Afghan-Afghan peace talks and believes that its progress to be contrary to the principle of the will to put an end to the war and violence in Afghanistan. With such behavior, the opportunity for peace in this country will be lost.

Faced with the US commitment to fulfill its obligations under the bilateral peace agreement, the Taliban have held the Afghan-Afghan peace talks hostage to the implementation of those commitments and the withdrawal of all foreign troops from Afghanistan.

Of course, the Taliban have not only conditioned progress on the peace talks with the Afghan government on the fulfillment of the US obligations under the peace agreement, but also have called for a change in the structure of power and government in Afghanistan.

The biggest internal demand of the Taliban in the peace process in Afghanistan is the overthrow of the current government and the establishment of the Islamic Emirate in that country. Taliban leaders have repeatedly stated that they do not recognize the Afghan government and constitution, and that a peace agreement should lead to the formation of an Islamic Emirate in Afghanistan.

Insistence of the Taliban is on changing the system of government in Afghanistan to the Islamic Emirate, while the nation and government have repeatedly stated that a peace agreement should not be made at the expense of the constitution and democracy and the return of the group to government.

The Taliban’s insistence on establishing an Islamic Emirate in Afghanistan, is at a time when its possible realization, will violate crucial constitutional clauses, including the republic, which has underpinned the formation of power in the country due to the will of the people and their participation in continuing this process. In the Taliban’s model for the establishment of the Islamic Emirate, the people have no role in governing and exercising their right to self-determination. The republican system, defined by the Afghan constitution as the essence of the country’s political system, is people-centered, and elections are an important tool in this model of government to prevent the government from moving towards tyranny.

In condition under which the Afghan people have experienced the Taliban dictatorship and its devastating consequences in various political, social, cultural and economic spheres, they strongly oppose any peace plan that would lead to the return of this model of government to their country and call on the Afghan government to defend all the principles of the constitution, especially the principle of the republic, in the process of negotiations with the Taliban to end the grip and establish peace.

It seems that as long as the Taliban do not distance themselves from their destructive positions, including changing the constitution and establishing the Islamic Emirate in Afghanistan, the stalemate in the peace talks between the group and the government will continue and the opportunity to end the years of violence and conflict are disappearing in Afghanistan.

As the Afghan government and people oppose the Taliban’s aspirations, including the establishment of an Islamic Emirate in Afghanistan and the loss of democratic gains in that country, the US government insists on the formation of an interim government that will oust Mohammad Ashraf Ghani’s government. This issue is facing serious opposition in that country.

Russia’s plan to host a joint Afghan government meeting with the Taliban also focuses on the formation of a transitional government, a model similar to the one the US-led interim government is pursuing.

The US and Russian governments, which support the formation of an interim government in Afghanistan, believe that if the interim government takes over the country for a new presidential election, the current challenge in the Afghan-Afghan negotiation process will be resolved.

The Taliban, meanwhile, are fundamentally opposed to an issue called elections and the role of the people in shaping the pillars of power in Afghanistan, and only seek to form a government in which only one ‘emir’ has the power to decide and control everything.

In the system of the Taliban Emirate, which has an ‘emir-centered’ nature, the role of the people is reduced, which is prone to tyranny and dictatorship, and the ‘emir’ has a lifelong position in that government.

Given that the Taliban are only thinking of returning Afghanistan to the period of dictatorship through the formation of the Islamic Emirate and want power only in the hands of this group, it will be very unlikely that the peace talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban will succeed.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the US-Saudi Nuclear Agreement

SCFR Online – Opinion: The new US-Saudi nuclear agreement, despite legal and political ambiguities, could alter previous non-proliferation standards in West Asia and intensify nuclear competition, ushering it into a new phase.

An Analysis of Recent Turkey-Israeli Regime Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: Recent developments in Syria indicate an intensification of strategic rivalry between Turkey and the Israeli regime, but mutual considerations and the role of the United States have limited the likelihood of direct war.

Increasing criticism of the extensive Zionist lobby network

SCFR Online – Opinion: An examination of the mechanisms of the Israeli regime’s influence in the United States depicts a complex picture of shared interests, strategic dependencies, and the limitations of this relationship.

Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact

SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?

Strategic Implications of the Reduction of US Weapons Stockpiles

SCFR Online – Opinion: The continuation of the US war against Iran, in addition to increasing operational costs, has called into question the actual capacity of the American arsenal to simultaneously fulfill security commitments on multiple fronts; an issue that affects deterrence, defense production capacity, and Washington’s resource prioritization.

The Formation of a New Order in Relations Between Powers

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Russia-Ukraine war and the war of the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran have been formed with different objectives and actors, but field and political developments indicate that they are not entirely separate from one another.

An Analysis of the Makkah Defense Pact

SCFR Online – Opinion: On Friday, August 7, the heads of state of three countries – Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan – signed a text under the title “Makkah Joint Defense Agreement.”

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the US-Saudi Nuclear Agreement

SCFR Online – Opinion: The new US-Saudi nuclear agreement, despite legal and political ambiguities, could alter previous non-proliferation standards in West Asia and intensify nuclear competition, ushering it into a new phase.

An Analysis of Recent Turkey-Israeli Regime Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: Recent developments in Syria indicate an intensification of strategic rivalry between Turkey and the Israeli regime, but mutual considerations and the role of the United States have limited the likelihood of direct war.

Increasing criticism of the extensive Zionist lobby network

SCFR Online – Opinion: An examination of the mechanisms of the Israeli regime’s influence in the United States depicts a complex picture of shared interests, strategic dependencies, and the limitations of this relationship.

Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact

SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?

Strategic Implications of the Reduction of US Weapons Stockpiles

SCFR Online – Opinion: The continuation of the US war against Iran, in addition to increasing operational costs, has called into question the actual capacity of the American arsenal to simultaneously fulfill security commitments on multiple fronts; an issue that affects deterrence, defense production capacity, and Washington’s resource prioritization.

The Formation of a New Order in Relations Between Powers

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Russia-Ukraine war and the war of the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran have been formed with different objectives and actors, but field and political developments indicate that they are not entirely separate from one another.

An Analysis of the Makkah Defense Pact

SCFR Online – Opinion: On Friday, August 7, the heads of state of three countries – Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan – signed a text under the title “Makkah Joint Defense Agreement.”

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Implications of the US-Saudi Nuclear Agreement

SCFR Online – Opinion: The new US-Saudi nuclear agreement, despite legal and political ambiguities, could alter previous non-proliferation standards in West Asia and intensify nuclear competition, ushering it into a new phase.

An Analysis of Recent Turkey-Israeli Regime Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: Recent developments in Syria indicate an intensification of strategic rivalry between Turkey and the Israeli regime, but mutual considerations and the role of the United States have limited the likelihood of direct war.

Increasing criticism of the extensive Zionist lobby network

SCFR Online – Opinion: An examination of the mechanisms of the Israeli regime’s influence in the United States depicts a complex picture of shared interests, strategic dependencies, and the limitations of this relationship.

Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact

SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?

Strategic Implications of the Reduction of US Weapons Stockpiles

SCFR Online – Opinion: The continuation of the US war against Iran, in addition to increasing operational costs, has called into question the actual capacity of the American arsenal to simultaneously fulfill security commitments on multiple fronts; an issue that affects deterrence, defense production capacity, and Washington’s resource prioritization.

The Formation of a New Order in Relations Between Powers

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Russia-Ukraine war and the war of the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran have been formed with different objectives and actors, but field and political developments indicate that they are not entirely separate from one another.

An Analysis of the Makkah Defense Pact

SCFR Online – Opinion: On Friday, August 7, the heads of state of three countries – Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan – signed a text under the title “Makkah Joint Defense Agreement.”

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Implications of the US-Saudi Nuclear Agreement

SCFR Online – Opinion: The new US-Saudi nuclear agreement, despite legal and political ambiguities, could alter previous non-proliferation standards in West Asia and intensify nuclear competition, ushering it into a new phase.

An Analysis of Recent Turkey-Israeli Regime Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: Recent developments in Syria indicate an intensification of strategic rivalry between Turkey and the Israeli regime, but mutual considerations and the role of the United States have limited the likelihood of direct war.

Increasing criticism of the extensive Zionist lobby network

SCFR Online – Opinion: An examination of the mechanisms of the Israeli regime’s influence in the United States depicts a complex picture of shared interests, strategic dependencies, and the limitations of this relationship.

Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact

SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?

Strategic Implications of the Reduction of US Weapons Stockpiles

SCFR Online – Opinion: The continuation of the US war against Iran, in addition to increasing operational costs, has called into question the actual capacity of the American arsenal to simultaneously fulfill security commitments on multiple fronts; an issue that affects deterrence, defense production capacity, and Washington’s resource prioritization.

The Formation of a New Order in Relations Between Powers

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Russia-Ukraine war and the war of the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran have been formed with different objectives and actors, but field and political developments indicate that they are not entirely separate from one another.

An Analysis of the Makkah Defense Pact

SCFR Online – Opinion: On Friday, August 7, the heads of state of three countries – Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan – signed a text under the title “Makkah Joint Defense Agreement.”

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Implications of the US-Saudi Nuclear Agreement

SCFR Online – Opinion: The new US-Saudi nuclear agreement, despite legal and political ambiguities, could alter previous non-proliferation standards in West Asia and intensify nuclear competition, ushering it into a new phase.

An Analysis of Recent Turkey-Israeli Regime Tensions

SCFR Online – Opinion: Recent developments in Syria indicate an intensification of strategic rivalry between Turkey and the Israeli regime, but mutual considerations and the role of the United States have limited the likelihood of direct war.

Increasing criticism of the extensive Zionist lobby network

SCFR Online – Opinion: An examination of the mechanisms of the Israeli regime’s influence in the United States depicts a complex picture of shared interests, strategic dependencies, and the limitations of this relationship.

Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact

SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?

Strategic Implications of the Reduction of US Weapons Stockpiles

SCFR Online – Opinion: The continuation of the US war against Iran, in addition to increasing operational costs, has called into question the actual capacity of the American arsenal to simultaneously fulfill security commitments on multiple fronts; an issue that affects deterrence, defense production capacity, and Washington’s resource prioritization.

The Formation of a New Order in Relations Between Powers

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Russia-Ukraine war and the war of the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran have been formed with different objectives and actors, but field and political developments indicate that they are not entirely separate from one another.

An Analysis of the Makkah Defense Pact

SCFR Online – Opinion: On Friday, August 7, the heads of state of three countries – Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan – signed a text under the title “Makkah Joint Defense Agreement.”

Loading