Hamid Khoshayand – an expert on regional issues

There is a lot of evidence showing that contrary to the statements of American statesmen who apparently call for a ceasefire and avoid conflict in Lebanon, the Biden administration and the White House are not just a passive ally, which the Zionists sometimes defy, but in point by point developments in Lebanon is a “synchronous and aligned government” with the Zionist regime.

Recently, the Reuters news agency revealed the real dimensions of the US policy towards Lebanon and Hezbollah and by referring to the words of Matthew Miller, the spokesperson of the US State Department, regarding Washington’s support for Tel Aviv’s actions in targeting Hezbollah’s infrastructure, he emphasized: “The policy to solve the tension between Lebanon’s Hezbollah and Tel Aviv through diplomacy is no longer the US approach to developments in West Asia, and Washington is no longer willing to prevent the war.

This change of approach, especially after the “terror campaign” of the Zionist regime in Lebanon, which led to the martyrdom of Seyed Hassan Nasrallah and several senior commanders of the Hezbollah, has become more “candid” and America, with the idea that after the loss of Seyed Hassan Nasrallah, the Hezbollah has lost it power, is trying to change `the political trends in Lebanon.

The American government in every possible way, including supporting the Zionist regime’s war against Hezbollah and Lebanon, destroying the image of Hezbollah, creating costs for the Resistance in the public opinion of Lebanon, and inciting the people and various political currents against the Hezbollah in a way that puts all the sufferings and problems at the feet of the Resistance. Lebanon writes that it seeks to reduce the influence and, subsequently, “remove” Hezbollah from Lebanon’s political future.

Recently, the American website Axios revealed the new American plan to change the balance of power in Lebanon. Citing American officials, it disclosed: “The White House intends to take advantage of the current situation of the Hezbollah in Lebanon in order to elect a new Lebanese president as soon as possible.”

At the same time, the American ambassador in Lebanon, in a meeting with some political forces and independent representatives of the parliament, in statements that do not match Hezbollah’s field and regional status, suggested that “Hezbollah has been weakened and its control over the government can no longer be tolerated. In the near future, we must prepare for a stage in Lebanese politics where Hezbollah has no place.”

In sum, America has turned to a double and complicated game in the region and Lebanon. Contrary to human rights gestures, Washington is “the main cause of killing” in occupied Lebanon and Palestine. In practice, other Western countries do not take any effective steps to establish a ceasefire and stop the war of the Zionist regime in Lebanon. In a way, they are following the policies of the United States. Of course, France is trying to play a role in Lebanon’s political environment, if possible, in a relatively realistic manner and interaction with Hezbollah, although maintaining the former colonial approaches.

Without the support of the United States, the Zionist regime could not last more than a few days against the Resistance of Lebanon, whose fighting organization had not been damaged even after the assassination of Seyed Hassan Nasrallah.

By observing the field and political trends and Developments in the region and especially in Lebanon, it seems that there is a large and common regional agenda under the guidance of the United States to, if possible, “political and security order” ruling Lebanon by removing the political future.

Of course, Lebanon is the starting point of America’s desired order, which may be followed in other Arab countries, including Syria, and even America’s Arab partners in the region, depending on the perspective of developments. America, which does not have the necessary conditions to directly enter into war and conflict in the region and Lebanon, is well aware of the political, social, cultural, etc. links of the Lebanese people with Hezbollah.

Therefore, he considers the people’s “interest” in Hezbollah an “obstacle” to advancing and realizing his political plans in this country. He considers military measures, war, and displacement the only effective ways to cut off this interest and link and thus remove Hezbollah from Lebanon’s political future.

In any case, contrary to America’s views, Hezbollah has not been weakened. There is no apparent reason or sign of Hezbollah’s field and military weakening in Lebanon, and the scene of the conflicts also confirms this. In addition, Hezbollah is also committed to Lebanon’s interests, security, and national sovereignty, as it shows in practice. It welcomes any ceasefire plan that considers the Lebanese people’s interests and the Resistance of this country.