Washington’s Afghan Approach after Plane Crash

2020/02/09 | interview, Politics, Top News

Strategic Council Online: An Afghan affairs expert says it seems we will witness more Taliban violence against the United States in the future. “Under Ronald Trump, keeping the status quo and its continuation despite the Taliban violence is regarded one of the main indicators of the US foreign policy in Afghanistan and one cannot expect Washington to make a tangible change in its Afghan policies after the failure of 11 rounds of negotiations and the shooting down of a military plane,” he said.

Mohammad Reza Asgari Muroudi, speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, referring to the Taliban claim to have shot down a US military aircraft, said: The talks took place in Qatar between US Special Representative for Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad and Taliban representative and suggest that the Taliban are unwilling to reduce the intensity of violence and conflicts in Afghanistan even in the midst of talks with the White House.

He recalled that Khalilzad had earlier called on the Taliban to work toward a peace deal to reduce violence, adding that the Taliban, on the one hand, is negotiating with the United States in an effort to escalate the conflict and cause more violence in Afghanistan in order to gain more concessions from the Americans in the negotiation process.

The message of Plane Downing to White House

He pointed out that given the Taliban’s approach in the last two decades it is often known as an invulnerable group in Afghanistan’s political scene: The downing of the plane is a message to the White House that Americans should agree to Taliban’s main term to establish peace in Afghanistan.

He explained: The Taliban have repeatedly stated that until US forces completely leave Afghanistan, any peace accord and permanent ceasefire in the country will be beyond expectation, and the failure of 11 rounds of talks between the two sides has shown that the Taliban are unwilling to back down.

America’s Dishonesty about Leaving Afghanistan

Asgari emphasized that the Americans do not seem to be sincere about their withdrawal, adding: “Although it is quite obvious that the end of the war and the establishment of stability and peace in Afghanistan depend on the complete withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, but during the more than a year of talks with the Taliban, they have been reluctant to withdraw part of their forces from some parts of Afghanistan, in order to build confidence in a peace deal.”

He added: “The Americans, within the framework of their strategy in the region, are reluctant to leave Afghanistan, and have considered it a permanent base that would allow their military easier access in times of need for overall US security.”

More Violence and Conflicts Expected from Taliban

Asgari added: Taking this issue into consideration, the Taliban are seeking to convey the message that it continues to insist on confronting the presence of foreign troops in Afghanistan, and it seems that as long as the Americans fail to set a specific timetable for the withdrawal of their troops the talks with the Taliban would turn ambiguous with no prospects in sight and we should also expect the escalation of Taliban violence in Afghanistan.

On the future status of the Americans in Afghanistan under the current conditions, the experts said: “Because of Mr Trump’s lack of foreign policy experience, in the nearly four years he has been in the White House, the various aspects of the US foreign policy have faced confusion and the Americans were unable to gain clear frameworks in foreign policy and in regulating their relations with various countries and regional and international organizations.”

Unknown US Strategy towards Afghanistan

He cited Afghanistan as one of the challenges Trump failed to provide a clear strategy for, and added: “This has led to an uncertain strategy for Afghanistan before White House officials.” In such circumstances, maintaining the status quo, despite the Taliban’s violence, is one of the key indicators of US foreign policy in Afghanistan, so it is unlikely that Americans would want a tangible change after the deadlock of eleven rounds of talks and a plane crash.

 

Noting that an escalation of Taliban violence against America is likely in the future Asgari said there is strong speculation among the Taliban that the Americans are practically challenging the talks by disrupting the peace negotiations and by insisting to stay in Afghanistan.

Taliban Distrust US in Peace Talks

He added: “This perception has been created by the Taliban leadership council that the Americans have taken them into a vicious circle. Basically, the issue of peace talks in Afghanistan has become a joke for the Americans and the Taliban in order to show that they are not willing to modify their positions they show their resolve by increasing violence.

Asgari said that US troops in the region and Afghanistan have become more vulnerable than ever, adding: “It seems that if the Taliban add to their violence and conflicts, the Americans will have to reconsider their military presence in Afghanistan under these critical and difficult conditions.

US Strategy Shift toward Taliban Ineffective

On possibility of a change of strategy towards the Taliban in the wake of growing violence, he said: As of the end of 2014, based on an agreement they reached with the Afghan government, the Americans had announced that their combat mission had been completed and they will be beside the army and the police force as advisors and trainers. Although they have repeatedly violated this commitment over the past five years, they have arbitrarily launched nightly airstrikes against civilians in Afghanistan killing hundreds of women and children and innocent people in Afghanistan.

Asgari continued: Although it is likely that as the Taliban violence intensifies the Americans will more or less breach their commitment to end combat operations in Afghanistan, but there is a clear experience facing Western countries, especially the United States. Even before 2014, when NATO was involved in counter-Taliban operations, despite having 150,000 foreign troops in Afghanistan, they were unable to accomplish their plans in Afghanistan and contain the Taliban. If they change their strategy in Afghanistan and enter a new round of combat operations, there will be no better outcome!

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Increasing criticism of the extensive Zionist lobby network

SCFR Online – Opinion: An examination of the mechanisms of the Israeli regime’s influence in the United States depicts a complex picture of shared interests, strategic dependencies, and the limitations of this relationship.

Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact

SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?

Strategic Implications of the Reduction of US Weapons Stockpiles

SCFR Online – Opinion: The continuation of the US war against Iran, in addition to increasing operational costs, has called into question the actual capacity of the American arsenal to simultaneously fulfill security commitments on multiple fronts; an issue that affects deterrence, defense production capacity, and Washington’s resource prioritization.

The Formation of a New Order in Relations Between Powers

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Russia-Ukraine war and the war of the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran have been formed with different objectives and actors, but field and political developments indicate that they are not entirely separate from one another.

An Analysis of the Makkah Defense Pact

SCFR Online – Opinion: On Friday, August 7, the heads of state of three countries – Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan – signed a text under the title “Makkah Joint Defense Agreement.”

Dimensions and challenges of the initiative to revive the Hejaz Railway

Strategic Council Online – Note: The initiative to revive the Hejaz Railway, beyond being a transportation project, constitutes an attempt to redefine geopolitics, the economy, and Turkey’s regional position; however, its realization appears to face significant financial, security, and institutional challenges.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Increasing criticism of the extensive Zionist lobby network

SCFR Online – Opinion: An examination of the mechanisms of the Israeli regime’s influence in the United States depicts a complex picture of shared interests, strategic dependencies, and the limitations of this relationship.

Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact

SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?

Strategic Implications of the Reduction of US Weapons Stockpiles

SCFR Online – Opinion: The continuation of the US war against Iran, in addition to increasing operational costs, has called into question the actual capacity of the American arsenal to simultaneously fulfill security commitments on multiple fronts; an issue that affects deterrence, defense production capacity, and Washington’s resource prioritization.

The Formation of a New Order in Relations Between Powers

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Russia-Ukraine war and the war of the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran have been formed with different objectives and actors, but field and political developments indicate that they are not entirely separate from one another.

An Analysis of the Makkah Defense Pact

SCFR Online – Opinion: On Friday, August 7, the heads of state of three countries – Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan – signed a text under the title “Makkah Joint Defense Agreement.”

Dimensions and challenges of the initiative to revive the Hejaz Railway

Strategic Council Online – Note: The initiative to revive the Hejaz Railway, beyond being a transportation project, constitutes an attempt to redefine geopolitics, the economy, and Turkey’s regional position; however, its realization appears to face significant financial, security, and institutional challenges.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Increasing criticism of the extensive Zionist lobby network

SCFR Online – Opinion: An examination of the mechanisms of the Israeli regime’s influence in the United States depicts a complex picture of shared interests, strategic dependencies, and the limitations of this relationship.

Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact

SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?

Strategic Implications of the Reduction of US Weapons Stockpiles

SCFR Online – Opinion: The continuation of the US war against Iran, in addition to increasing operational costs, has called into question the actual capacity of the American arsenal to simultaneously fulfill security commitments on multiple fronts; an issue that affects deterrence, defense production capacity, and Washington’s resource prioritization.

The Formation of a New Order in Relations Between Powers

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Russia-Ukraine war and the war of the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran have been formed with different objectives and actors, but field and political developments indicate that they are not entirely separate from one another.

An Analysis of the Makkah Defense Pact

SCFR Online – Opinion: On Friday, August 7, the heads of state of three countries – Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan – signed a text under the title “Makkah Joint Defense Agreement.”

Dimensions and challenges of the initiative to revive the Hejaz Railway

Strategic Council Online – Note: The initiative to revive the Hejaz Railway, beyond being a transportation project, constitutes an attempt to redefine geopolitics, the economy, and Turkey’s regional position; however, its realization appears to face significant financial, security, and institutional challenges.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Increasing criticism of the extensive Zionist lobby network

SCFR Online – Opinion: An examination of the mechanisms of the Israeli regime’s influence in the United States depicts a complex picture of shared interests, strategic dependencies, and the limitations of this relationship.

Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact

SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?

Strategic Implications of the Reduction of US Weapons Stockpiles

SCFR Online – Opinion: The continuation of the US war against Iran, in addition to increasing operational costs, has called into question the actual capacity of the American arsenal to simultaneously fulfill security commitments on multiple fronts; an issue that affects deterrence, defense production capacity, and Washington’s resource prioritization.

The Formation of a New Order in Relations Between Powers

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Russia-Ukraine war and the war of the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran have been formed with different objectives and actors, but field and political developments indicate that they are not entirely separate from one another.

An Analysis of the Makkah Defense Pact

SCFR Online – Opinion: On Friday, August 7, the heads of state of three countries – Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan – signed a text under the title “Makkah Joint Defense Agreement.”

Dimensions and challenges of the initiative to revive the Hejaz Railway

Strategic Council Online – Note: The initiative to revive the Hejaz Railway, beyond being a transportation project, constitutes an attempt to redefine geopolitics, the economy, and Turkey’s regional position; however, its realization appears to face significant financial, security, and institutional challenges.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Increasing criticism of the extensive Zionist lobby network

SCFR Online – Opinion: An examination of the mechanisms of the Israeli regime’s influence in the United States depicts a complex picture of shared interests, strategic dependencies, and the limitations of this relationship.

Realities of the Tripartite Makkah Pact

SCFR Online – Interview: The signing of the Makkah agreement between Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey has raised questions about the future of the region’s security structure and the position of these countries in West Asian equations. Can this agreement become a genuine collective defense mechanism, or does it have more of a political and deterrent function than creating new military capacity?

Strategic Implications of the Reduction of US Weapons Stockpiles

SCFR Online – Opinion: The continuation of the US war against Iran, in addition to increasing operational costs, has called into question the actual capacity of the American arsenal to simultaneously fulfill security commitments on multiple fronts; an issue that affects deterrence, defense production capacity, and Washington’s resource prioritization.

The Formation of a New Order in Relations Between Powers

SCFR Online – Opinion: The Russia-Ukraine war and the war of the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran have been formed with different objectives and actors, but field and political developments indicate that they are not entirely separate from one another.

An Analysis of the Makkah Defense Pact

SCFR Online – Opinion: On Friday, August 7, the heads of state of three countries – Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan – signed a text under the title “Makkah Joint Defense Agreement.”

Dimensions and challenges of the initiative to revive the Hejaz Railway

Strategic Council Online – Note: The initiative to revive the Hejaz Railway, beyond being a transportation project, constitutes an attempt to redefine geopolitics, the economy, and Turkey’s regional position; however, its realization appears to face significant financial, security, and institutional challenges.

Loading