Analysis; Strategy of Relations between Iran & Russia

2021/09/01 | Note, Politics, Top News

Strategic Council Online- Note: During the recent years and in view of geopolitical and structural changes in the international system, and also the decline of muscle-flexing of the United States, “Iran and Russia” as important international players managed to get a greater share of the power game. At a later stage, they tried to create mechanisms for mutual cooperation in all fields (economic, military- security, and political) and also maximizing their power and national interests in line with their regional and international policies. Aref Bijan, Expert on Russian affairs

Evidences indicate that Iran and Russia have common strategic interests in bilateral areas (economic, military-security), regional level (their role in the new security system of the Middle East region) and international arena (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, widely known as JCPOA, and confronting the U.S. unilateralism).

  • Cooperation in Defense- Military field

Military-Defense contracts and also holding joint war-games of Iran and Russia have turned to become one of the most dynamic fields of cooperation between the two countries within the past several years. In this connection, Mohammad Javad Zarif, the then Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs paid a couple of visits to Moscow during the Summer 2020, the first in June and the second in July, following the termination of sanctions against Iran, Russia started to sell military weaponry to Iran.

Likewise, the trip made by General Amir Hatami, Iranian Minister of Defense to attend in the International Military-Technical Forum “ Army 2020, which was held in Moscow August 23-29, have prompted the stipulations for further strengthening of technical and military cooperation between Moscow and Tehran followed by the termination of weaponry sanctions against Iran. Having shown interest to cooperate with Iran, Russia can be an important supplier of sophisticated weapons systems, military equipment and technology.

  • Bilateral partnership in the new Middle East order

After the outbreak of Arab Spring in 2011, the strategic region of the Middle East has entered into a new security order. Perhaps, we might have witnessed the least cooperation between Iran and Russia prior to the crisis in this region. But the common interests between the two countries in containing and preventing terrorist groups and also confronting the U.S. unilateralism helped to form good proximity and coordination between them. The most important example of the changes in ties between Iran and Russia were the two sides’ cooperation in crisis-stricken region of the Middle East, especially in Syria and Iraq. In the light of the developments took place in Syria and Iraq and the vacuum of power in the region, Iran and Russia managed to fill it successfully. Now, increasing clout and influence of the two countries in the region include the strengthened relations with Hezbollah in Lebanon, Assad government in Syria, Hamas in Palestine, Iraqi government and Houthis in Yemen. From the other hand, the military cooperation of Iran and Russia to fight against terrorism was not confined to Syrian territory; according to some reports, Iran and Russia with the collaboration of Syria and Iraq have established a center to exchange information on anti- ISIS in Baghdad in which intelligence and information were exchanged and analyzed among them.

Tehran is a reliable ally for Moscow in a very unstable region. It seems that in view of its pivotal role in strategic objectives for both side, war in Syria is the most important area of cooperation between Moscow and Tehran.

Three key factors of Iran’s position in the Middle East and the quality of relations between Russia and Iran in the coming years are as follows:

  • Future policies of the U.S. president
  • Continuation of the U.S. sanctions against both countries
  • Developments in the neighboring countries which has essential importance for the interests of Iran and Russia

 

 

  • Kremlin’s Emphasis on preserving JCPOA     

JCPOA agreement, Trump’s withdrawal from JCPOA and pursuing negotiations for JCPOA revival during Biden Administration are also among effective factors on Tehran-Moscow relations.

After the withdrawal of the U.S. from JCPOA and pursuing the “maximum pressure” strategy, and Iran’s new policy on “Looking to the East”, strengthening economic, political, military – security collaboration with Russia have gained more credibility. Russia, as an effective player in JCPOA believes that Washington should return to the treaty and cancel the sanctions against Tehran. Foreign policy apparatus of Russia believes that withdrawal of the U.S. from JCPOA and destroying the main motivation of Iran to completely abide by her nuclear commitments caused Tehran not only to reject further limitations but also to disentangle herself from existing binds.

  • Moscow-Tehran Alignment to Confront the U.S. Unilateralism

At geopolitical level, we are experiencing a transitional period which has started from second decade of 21th century. The world is moving from unipolar to bipolar or multi-polar system, which will probably be flourished during the present century. The new model of bipolar geopolitics will have two major poles which will compete with each other. A pole comprising the U.S. and the European Union which is weak at the moment, and a strong pole containing China and Russia under the protection of Euro-Asia whose influence will increase day by day. Amid all this, the partnership of Russia and Iran is meant in line with their common interests and strong confrontation with the U.S. hegemony. They believe that Trump administration unilateralism caused hamper in international system and has seriously endangered their interests. Thus, they are looking for a more balanced international order and a multi-polar world.

Therefore, both Russia and Iran have shown their commitment to create similar networks and multilateral organizations at regional level (like Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), Euro-Asia Economic Union, the recent 25-year Agreement between Iran and China, and 20-year Agreement with Russia) in order to create an efficient balance against the U.S. unipolar.

Conclusion               

The world has always been dealt with the fear and threat emanated from insecurity and chaos, but every individual country can change the threats to opportunities according to its own national interests. Strengthening of cooperation between Russia and Iran is, naturally, justifiable and considerable in view of their national and regional interests. Having Regarded the present implications in relations of the two countries, one can realize the strategic look of the two sides on the ties.

Moscow, will undoubtedly, continue to play the card of her ties with Iran once her relations with Washington is concerned. In order to achieve this goal, Russia will strengthen her cooperation with Iran at regional level in the field of fighting terrorism and in strategic important fields like development of non-military nuclear and military cooperation. From the other hand, geopolitical, ideological and cultural differences exist in relations between them, but the volatile situation of the Middle East will reduce the restrictions, dangers and potential problems caused by geopolitical disputes (competitive dynamism) at the cost of strengthening ties with winning result of (cooperation dynamism) aiming at confronting  mutual security concerns in the region.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

The Components of Iran’s Deterrence Power

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

The Components of Iran’s Deterrence Power

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

The Components of Iran’s Deterrence Power

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

The Components of Iran’s Deterrence Power

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

Iran’s Potential Levers of Power

SCFRonline– Opinion: Iran’s geopolitical power is not limited solely to oil and the Strait of Hormuz; the unintended emergence of disruptions in the future global food and energy security chains can also demonstrate Iran’s strategic importance.

The Inseparability of the Lebanese Front from the Axis of Resistance

SCFR Online–Opinion: By providing an extensive network of social, healthcare, educational, and post-war reconstruction services, Hezbollah has established a strong social base for itself among Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis, and even beyond that, among other segments of Lebanese society, including Christians. Hezbollah has never been an external actor imposed upon Lebanon; rather, it is a phenomenon fundamentally born out of the occupation and crimes of the Zionist regime and itself influenced by popular resistance.

The Increasing Efforts of the Zionist Regime to Redefine Borders and the Regional Order and Its Consequences

SCFR Online– Opinion: Security and military developments in the region over recent months indicate that the ongoing crises and wars in Gaza, southern Lebanon, and parts of Syrian territory encompass broader dimensions of geopolitical and geostrategic transformations. In this context, the increased military presence and control of the Zionist regime over parts of the territories of these areas, along with proposals regarding the creation of buffer zones or even the expansion of security borders, have raised serious questions about the future of the regional order and its consequences for the countries of West Asia.

The Components of Iran’s Deterrence Power

SCFR Online – Opinion: At a time when regional security equations have reached a sensitive stage under the influence of Iran’s strategic confrontation with the United States and the Zionist regime, the question of the nature of Tehran’s defensive power has gained greater significance than ever before. While Washington and Tel Aviv rely on their technological superiority, the Islamic Republic of Iran has presented a model of deterrence that extends beyond the material calculations of the world’s classical militaries. This power, rooted in the connection between “the field” and “the people,” has not only altered the balance of power in recent conflicts but has also disrupted adversaries’ calculations when confronting Iran’s strategic depth.

Loading